Literature DB >> 21170142

Models of the reading process.

Keith Rayner1, Erik D Reichle2.   

Abstract

Reading is a complex skill involving the orchestration of a number of components. Researchers often talk about a 'model of reading' when talking about only one aspect of the reading process (e.g., models of word identification are often referred to as 'models of reading'). Here, we review prominent models that are designed to account for (1) word identification, (2) syntactic parsing, (3) discourse representations, and (4) how certain aspects of language processing (e.g., word identification), in conjunction with other constraints (e.g., limited visual acuity, saccadic error) guide readers' eyes. Unfortunately, it is the case that these various models addressing specific aspects of the reading process seldom make contact with models dealing with other aspects of reading. Thus, for example, the models of word identification seldom make contact with models of eye-movement control, and vice versa. Although this may be unfortunate in some ways, it is quite understandable in other ways because reading itself is a very complex process. We discuss prototypical models of aspects of the reading process in the order mentioned above. We do not review all possible models but rather focus on those we view as being representative and most highly recognized. WIREs Cogn Sci 2010 1 787-799 This article is categorized under: Linguistics > Computational Models of Language Psychology > Language.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21170142      PMCID: PMC3001687          DOI: 10.1002/wcs.68

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1939-5078


  51 in total

1.  The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Jane Ashby; Alexander Pollatsek; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes.

Authors:  Michael W Harm; Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  Roger Levy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-07-30

5.  Oculomotor control in a sequential search task.

Authors:  Hans A Trukenbrod; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Mindless reading revisited: an analysis based on the SWIFT model of eye-movement control.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Eye movement control during reading: a simulation of some word-targeting strategies.

Authors:  R G Reilly; J K O'Regan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

9.  Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Tessa Warren; Kerry McConnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

10.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  14 in total

1.  Semantic predictability eliminates the transposed-letter effect.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; Kiel Christianson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

2.  Single-Word Recognition Need Not Depend on Single-Word Features: Narrative Coherence Counteracts Effects of Single-Word Features that Lexical Decision Emphasizes.

Authors:  Dan W Teng; Sebastian Wallot; Damian G Kelty-Stephen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-12

3.  Eye movements modulate the spatiotemporal dynamics of word processing.

Authors:  Simona Temereanca; Matti S Hämäläinen; Gina R Kuperberg; Steve M Stufflebeam; Eric Halgren; Emery N Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  GECO-CN: Ghent Eye-tracking COrpus of sentence reading for Chinese-English bilinguals.

Authors:  Longjiao Sui; Nicolas Dirix; Evy Woumans; Wouter Duyck
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-07-27

5.  Lexical decisions in adults with low and high susceptibility to pattern-related visual stress: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  James M Gilchrist; Peter M Allen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-14

6.  Constraints are the solution, not the problem.

Authors:  Sebastian Wallot; Damian Kelty-Stephen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Cues to stress assignment in reading aloud.

Authors:  Maria Ktori; Petroula Mousikou; Kathleen Rastle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-01

8.  Predictive modeling of parafoveal information processing during reading.

Authors:  Stefan Seelig; Sarah Risse; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Attention shifts the language network reflecting paradigm presentation.

Authors:  Kathrin Kollndorfer; Julia Furtner; Jacqueline Krajnik; Daniela Prayer; Veronika Schöpf
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  From "cracking the orthographic code" to "playing with language": toward a usage-based foundation of the reading process.

Authors:  Sebastian Wallot
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.