| Literature DB >> 21159160 |
Elsa Lamy1, Gonçalo Graça, Gonçalo da Costa, Catarina Franco, Fernando Capela E Silva, Elvira Sales Baptista, Ana Varela Coelho.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggested that dietary tannin ingestion may induce changes in mouse salivary proteins in addition to the primarily studied proline-rich proteins (PRPs). The aim of the present study was to determine the protein expression changes induced by condensed tannin intake on the fraction of mouse whole salivary proteins that are unable to form insoluble tannin-protein complexes. Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis protein separation was used, followed by protein identification by mass spectrometry.Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21159160 PMCID: PMC3018447 DOI: 10.1186/1477-5956-8-65
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proteome Sci ISSN: 1477-5956 Impact factor: 2.480
Comparison of parotid histomorphological parameters and saliva protein concentration between mice control (n = 6) and quebracho groups (n = 6)
| Parameters | Control Group | Quebracho Group | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13,415 ± 4,334 | 33,353 ± 14,413 | 13.0a | |
| 464 ± 78 | 739 ± 160 | 12.9a | |
| 2920 ± 289 | 1941 ± 138 | 0.00012b | |
Values presented correspond to mean ± standard deviation
Differences are significant for Z > 1.96
b Differences are significant for P < 0.05
Figure 1Examination by ligth microscopy of parotid glands. Original magnification X200 (bar = 50 μm). Acini from control group (A) are significantly lower than those from quebracho tannin-enriched diet group (B). a - acinus; d - salivary ducts.
Figure 2Two-dimensional proteome profile of mice whole saliva. Aliquots containing 100 μg of proteins from control animals were subjected to IEF in a 3-10 NL range, separated by molecular masses in 12% polyacrylamide gels and stained with Coomassie Coloidal G-250. Molecular markers masses are represented on the left side of the gel. Numbered protein spots were collected for protein identification.
Proteins from the soluble fraction of mice whole saliva identified by Mass spectrometry
| Protein name | Swiss-Prot accession number | Spot | Est. MW (kDa)/pI | Theor. MW (kDa)/pI | Identified by | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acidic mammalian chitinase | CHIA_MOUSE | 38 | 53/4.8 | 50/4.9 | 170 | 694 |
| 56 | 97/5.0 | --- | 192 | |||
| Androgen binding protein alpha | 36 | 15/5.0 | 10/5.4 | 78 | --- | |
| Androgen binding protein beta | 26 | 11/5.2 | 12/5.1 | 102 | 394 | |
| 27 | 11/5.0 | 80 | 140 | |||
| Androgen binding protein gamma | 42 | 11/7.2 | 13/7.7 | 121 | --- | |
| 43 | 10/6.1 | 157 | 546 | |||
| 44 | 10/6.0 | 69* | 442 | |||
| Carbonic anhydrase VI | CAH6_MOUSE | 9 | 44/5.0 | 35/5.8 | 177 | 428 |
| 10 | 44/5.1 | 156 | 637 | |||
| 11 | 44/5.2 | 193 | 699 | |||
| 12 | 44/5.3 | 134 | 535 | |||
| Cysteine-rich secretory protein 1 | CRIS1_MOUSE | 13 | 33/6.0 | 26/4.5 | 82* | 243 |
| 14 | 33/6.3 | 79* | 107 | |||
| Dcpp1 protein | 34 | 21/5.9 | 18/6.1 | 70* | --- | |
| 35 | 20/6.2 | 82* | ||||
| Dcpp2 protein | 18 | 17/6.8 | 16/7.8 | 97 | 421 | |
| Deoxyribonuclease-1 | DNAS1_MOUSE | 50 | 39/4.9 | 30/4.7 | 90 | 300 |
| Glandular Kallikrein K1 | KLK1_MOUSE | 20 | 18/5.7 | 26/4.9 | 79 | 476 |
| 41 | 21/5.1 | --- | 113 | |||
| a | 33/3.4 | 110 | ||||
| Glandular Kallikrein K13 | 40 | 12/5.1 | 26/8.3 | 71 | --- | |
| Glandular Kallikrein K5 | K1KB5_MOUSE | 47 | 32/5.4 | 26/5.3 | 109 | 514 |
| Glandular Kallikrein K9 | K1KB9_MOUSE | 21 | 12/6.4 | 26/7.2 | 84 | 283 |
| Glandular Kallikrein K22 | K1B22_MOUSE | 15 | 30/5.9 | 26/6.0 | 111 | 300 |
| 45 | 31/5.6 | 77* | --- | |||
| Muc 10 | 30 | 11/9.2 | 20/10.2 | 85* | --- | |
| Odorant binding protein Ia | 23 | 17/5.2 | 17/5.2 | 182 | 761 | |
| Odorant binding protein Ib | 48 | 18/5.4 | 17/5.5 | 118 | 506 | |
| Parotid secretory protein | PSP_MOUSE | 46 | 25/4.9 | 23/5.0 | 82 | 776 |
| c | 25/3.4 | --- | 360 | |||
| Prolactin-inducible protein homolog | PIP_MOUSE | 37 | 15/4.8 | 14/4.8 | --- | 107 |
| Salivary amylase | AMY1_MOUSE | 1 | 58/5,5 | 56/6.5 | 88 | 887 |
| 2 | 58/5,6 | 193 | 834 | |||
| 3 | 58/5,7 | 193 | 777 | |||
| 4 | 58/5,8 | 217 | 772 | |||
| 5 | 58/5,9 | 230 | 738 | |||
| 6 | 58/6,0 | 270 | 795 | |||
| 7 | 58/6,1 | 226 | 632 | |||
| 8 | 58/6,2 | 232 | 804 | |||
| 16 | 58/3,4 | 155 | 632 | |||
| 33 | 58/5,4 | 107 | 774 | |||
| 39 | 58/3,7 | 148 | 825 | |||
| 61 | 58/5,8 | 132 | 927 | |||
| 62 | 58/5,9 | 163 | 853 | |||
| 63 | 58/6,0 | 149 | 795 | |||
| Vomeromodulin precursor | 54 | 66/5.6 | 61/5.5 | 81# | --- | |
| 55 | 66/5.7 | 68# | ||||
a Score is significant (p < 0.05) when higher than 75 (search performed with no taxonomic restriction), 67 (* search restricted to mammal database), or 61 (# search restricted to rodent database);
b Total Ion Score is a result of the sum of all ion scores of the fragmented ions. Ions were only considered for protein identification if a significant ion score was obtained (p < 0,05).
Alpha-amylase predicted posttranslational modifications
| Spot | PTM | |
|---|---|---|
| N-glyc.1 | Deamidation2 | |
| 1 | ---- | 417; 419; 431 |
| 2 | 427; 475 | ----- |
| 3 | ---- | 417; 419; 431 |
| 4 | 475 | 364; 365; 379 |
| 5 | 427; 475 | 364; 365; 379; 417; 419; 431 |
| 6 | ---- | 364; 365; 379 |
| 7 | 475 | 364; 365; 379 |
| 39 | 427; 475 | ---- |
Here residues are indicated for which PTMs are predicted, according with mass spectra analysis
1 Based on the existence of a consensus region and the absence of the peptide from tryptic peptide maps
2 Based on FindMod and the absence of the peptide from the tryptic peptide maps
Comparison of the expression levels of selected proteins (%Vol, mean ± SD) between control (N = 6) and quebracho-fed animals (N = 6)
| Spot N° | Control group | Quebracho group | P | Protein |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17.07 ± 41.23 | 110.87 ± 59.55 | 0.0099 | Not identified | |
| 475.26 ± 272.43 | 110.99 ± 132.25 | 0.015 | Acidic mammalian chitinase precursor | |
| 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.44 ± 0.05 | 0.00015 | Salivary amylase | |
Differences are significant for P < 0.05
Figure 3Changes in the proteome of mice whole saliva after quebracho consumption. A) representative gel of an individual from control group; B) representative gel of an individual of quebracho group. A decrease in relative volume was observed for spot 38, whereas spots 24 and 62 increased after quebracho consumption. Spot 30 was only observed in the gels from control group, whereas spots Q1 and Q2 were only observed in 2-DE gels from quebracho group. These last spots were dark pink stained. Coloured pictures are presented in supplementary Figure S1. Some of the spots for which expression levels are different in this figure did not change consistently in all individuals and, consequently, are not discussed.