Literature DB >> 21145333

Shape and color conjunction stimuli are represented as bound objects in visual working memory.

Roy Luria1, Edward K Vogel.   

Abstract

The integrated object view of visual working memory (WM) argues that objects (rather than features) are the building block of visual WM, so that adding an extra feature to an object does not result in any extra cost to WM capacity. Alternative views have shown that complex objects consume additional WM storage capacity so that it may not be represented as bound objects. Additionally, it was argued that two features from the same dimension (i.e., color-color) do not form an integrated object in visual WM. This led some to argue for a "weak" object view of visual WM. We used the contralateral delay activity (the CDA) as an electrophysiological marker of WM capacity, to test those alternative hypotheses to the integrated object account. In two experiments we presented complex stimuli and color-color conjunction stimuli, and compared performance in displays that had one object but varying degrees of feature complexity. The results supported the integrated object account by showing that the CDA amplitude corresponded to the number of objects regardless of the number of features within each object, even for complex objects or color-color conjunction stimuli.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21145333      PMCID: PMC3095682          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  31 in total

1.  Evidence for two components of object-based selection.

Authors:  E Awh; H Dhaliwal; S Christensen; M Matsukura
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-07

2.  Is visual short-term memory object based? Rejection of the "strong-object" hypothesis.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-10

3.  A configural effect in visual short-term memory for features from different parts of an object.

Authors:  Jean-François Delvenne; Raymond Bruyer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  Understanding the object benefit in visual short-term memory: the roles of feature proximity and connectedness.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-07

5.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-12

7.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Feature binding, attention and object perception.

Authors:  A Treisman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Contralateral delay activity provides a neural measure of the number of representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Akiko Ikkai; Andrew W McCollough; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  42 in total

1.  Stimulus Load and Oscillatory Activity in Higher Cortex.

Authors:  Simon Kornblith; Timothy J Buschman; Earl K Miller
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

3.  The transition from feature to object: Storage unit in visual working memory depends on task difficulty.

Authors:  Jiehui Qian; Ke Zhang; Shengxi Liu; Quan Lei
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-11

4.  Come together, right now: dynamic overwriting of an object's history through common fate.

Authors:  Roy Luria; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Does attribute amnesia occur with the presentation of complex, meaningful stimuli? The answer is, "it depends".

Authors:  Hui Chen; Jiahan Yu; Yingtao Fu; Ping Zhu; Wei Li; Jifan Zhou; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-08

6.  Obligatory encoding of task-irrelevant features depletes working memory resources.

Authors:  Louise Marshall; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  More target features in visual working memory leads to poorer search guidance: evidence from contralateral delay activity.

Authors:  Joseph Schmidt; Annmarie MacNamara; Greg Hajcak Proudfit; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Retrieval from long-term memory reduces working memory representations for visual features and their bindings.

Authors:  Amanda E van Lamsweerde; Melissa R Beck; Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-02

9.  An integrative view of storage of low- and high-level visual dimensions in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Hagit Magen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-22

10.  Attention to attributes and objects in working memory.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Christopher L Blume; J Scott Saults
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.