Literature DB >> 11476101

Evidence for two components of object-based selection.

E Awh1, H Dhaliwal, S Christensen, M Matsukura.   

Abstract

A wealth of research has shown that observers can bias visual processing toward specific locations, but the role of object-based selection is less clear In support of object-based selection, previous research has shown that when two objects are presented simultaneously, observers are better at reporting two attributes from one of the objects than one attribute from each object. However there has been controversy over whether this effect is best explained by object-based selection or spatial selection. Our work suggests that there are two separate components of selection in this task: (Ca) a spatial component that is observed when the relevant targets are cued for observers before the onset of the stimulus display and (b) an object-based component that can still be observed when the first component has been eliminated. The latter effect replicates the initial evidence in favor of object-based selection, and can be demonstrated even when the relevant targets are cued after the offset of the target stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11476101     DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  16 in total

1.  Dynamic interaction of object- and space-based attention in retinotopic visual areas.

Authors:  Notger G Müller; Andreas Kleinschmidt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Interference between object-based attention and object-based memory.

Authors:  Michi Matsukura; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-06

3.  Object-based attention in Chinese readers of Chinese words: beyond Gestalt principles.

Authors:  Xingshan Li; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-10

4.  Object-based representations govern both the storage of information in visual short-term memory and the retrieval of information from it.

Authors:  Philip T Quinlan; Dale J Cohen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

5.  The spatial distribution of attention within and across objects.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Ashleigh M Maxcey-Richard; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Minimizing the disruptive effects of prospective memory in simulated air traffic control.

Authors:  Shayne Loft; Rebekah E Smith; Roger W Remington
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2013-09

7.  The Cost of Accessing an Object's Feature Stored in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011-01-01

8.  Attention to attributes and objects in working memory.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Christopher L Blume; J Scott Saults
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Perceptual organization influences visual working memory.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Shaun P Vecera; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

10.  Auditory memory can be object based.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dyson; Feraz Ishfaq
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.