Literature DB >> 21142490

Computational modeling of distal protection filters.

Gail M Siewiorek1, Ender A Finol.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantify the relationship between velocity and pressure gradient in a distal protection filter (DPF) and to determine the feasibility of modeling a DPF as a permeable surface using computational fluid dynamics (CFD).
METHODS: Four DPFs (Spider RX, FilterWire EZ, RX Accunet, and Emboshield) were deployed in a single tube representing the internal carotid artery (ICA) in an in vitro flow apparatus. Steady flow of a blood-like solution was circulated with a peristaltic pump and compliance chamber. The flow rate through each DPF was measured at physiological pressure gradients, and permeability was calculated using Darcy's equation. Two computational models representing the RX Accunet were created: an actual representation of the filter geometry and a circular permeable surface. The permeability of RX Accunet was assigned to the surface, and CFD simulations were conducted with both models using experimentally derived boundary conditions.
RESULTS: Spider RX had the largest permeability while RX Accunet was the least permeable filter. CFD modeling of RX Accunet and the permeable surface resulted in excellent agreement with the experimental measurements of velocity and pressure gradient. However, the permeable surface model did not accurately reproduce local flow patterns near the DPF deployment site.
CONCLUSION: CFD can be used to model DPFs, yielding global flow parameters measured with bench-top experiments. CFD models of the detailed DPF geometry could be used for "virtual testing" of device designs under simulated flow conditions, which would have potential benefits in decreasing the number of design iterations leading up to in vivo testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21142490      PMCID: PMC3000616          DOI: 10.1583/10-3178.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  24 in total

1.  Blood flow and vessel mechanics in a physiologically realistic model of a human carotid arterial bifurcation.

Authors:  S Z Zhao; X Y Xu; A D Hughes; S A Thom; A V Stanton; B Ariff; Q Long
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Carotid stenting with filter protection. Correlation of ACT values with angiographic and histopathologic findings.

Authors:  L Castellan; F Causin; D Danieli; S Perini
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.447

3.  3D critical plaque wall stress is a better predictor of carotid plaque rupture sites than flow shear stress: An in vivo MRI-based 3D FSI study.

Authors:  Zhongzhao Teng; Gador Canton; Chun Yuan; Marina Ferguson; Chun Yang; Xueying Huang; Jie Zheng; Pamela K Woodard; Dalin Tang
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis.

Authors:  Thomas G Brott; Robert W Hobson; George Howard; Gary S Roubin; Wayne M Clark; William Brooks; Ariane Mackey; Michael D Hill; Pierre P Leimgruber; Alice J Sheffet; Virginia J Howard; Wesley S Moore; Jenifer H Voeks; L Nelson Hopkins; Donald E Cutlip; David J Cohen; Jeffrey J Popma; Robert D Ferguson; Stanley N Cohen; Joseph L Blackshear; Frank L Silver; J P Mohr; Brajesh K Lal; James F Meschia
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-05-25       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Clinical advisory: carotid endarterectomy for patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Slow-flow phenomenon during carotid artery intervention with embolic protection devices: predictors and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Ivan P Casserly; Alex Abou-Chebl; Robert B Fathi; David S Lee; Jacqueline Saw; Jose E Exaire; Samir R Kapadia; Christopher T Bajzer; Jay S Yadav
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Inter-individual variations in wall shear stress and mechanical stress distributions at the carotid artery bifurcation of healthy humans.

Authors:  S Z Zhao; B Ariff; Q Long; A D Hughes; S A Thom; A V Stanton; X Y Xu
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Routine use of cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: results of a multicenter registry of 753 patients.

Authors:  Bernhard Reimers; Michael Schlüter; Fausto Castriota; Thilo Tübler; Nicola Corvaja; Carlo Cernetti; Raffaella Manetti; Amedeo Picciolo; Francesco Liistro; Carlo Di Mario; Alberto Cremonesi; Joachim Schofer; Antonio Colombo
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  1 in total

1.  In Silico Hemodynamics and Filtering Evaluation of a Commercial Embolic Protection Device.

Authors:  Antonio Gil; Pedro Quintero; Andrea Mares; Juan Ribera de Serra; Manuel Ignacio Sánchez-Nevárez; Manuel Miralles
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 3.934

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.