Literature DB >> 16226169

Slow-flow phenomenon during carotid artery intervention with embolic protection devices: predictors and clinical outcome.

Ivan P Casserly1, Alex Abou-Chebl, Robert B Fathi, David S Lee, Jacqueline Saw, Jose E Exaire, Samir R Kapadia, Christopher T Bajzer, Jay S Yadav.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this research was to define the predictors of the "slow-reflow" phenomenon during carotid artery intervention with filter-type embolic protection devices (EPDs) and to determine its prognostic significance.
BACKGROUND: During carotid artery intervention using filter-type EPDs, we have observed cases in which there is angiographic evidence of a significant reduction in antegrade flow in the internal carotid artery proximal to the filter device, termed "slow-flow." The predictors of this phenomenon and its prognostic significance are unknown.
METHODS: Using a single-center prospective carotid intervention registry, patients with slow-flow were compared to patients with normal flow during carotid intervention with respect to clinical, procedural, and lesion characteristics, and the 30-day incidence of death and stroke.
RESULTS: A total of 414 patients underwent 453 carotid artery interventions using EPDs. Slow-flow occurred in 42 patients (10.1%) undergoing 42 carotid interventions (9.3%), and most commonly occurred after post-stent balloon dilatation (71.4%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the following predictors of slow-flow: recent history (<6 months) of stroke or transient ischemic attack (odds ratio [OR] 2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4 to 5.6, p = 0.004), increased stent diameter (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.94, p = 0.044), and increased patient age (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.09, p = 0.025). Among patients with slow-flow, the 30-day incidence of stroke or death was 9.5% compared to 2.9% in patients with normal flow (chi-square = 4.73, p = 0.03). This difference was driven by the disparity in the 30-day incidence of stroke (9.5% vs. 1.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Slow-flow during carotid intervention with EPDs is a frequent event that is associated with an excess risk of periprocedural stroke. The association of the phenomenon with clinically symptomatic carotid lesions and use of larger stent diameters suggests that embolization of vulnerable plaque elements may play a pathogenic role.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16226169     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  15 in total

1.  Blood flow changes caused by distal filter protection and catheter aspiration in the internal carotid artery during carotid stenting: evaluation using carotid Doppler sonography.

Authors:  T Sorimachi; K Nishino; K Morita; S Takeuchi; Y Ito; Y Fujii
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Computational modeling of distal protection filters.

Authors:  Gail M Siewiorek; Ender A Finol
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 3.  The Angioguard embolic protection device.

Authors:  Gail M Siewiorek; Mark K Eskandari; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  Relevance of Distal Arterial Collapse in Stenting of Atherosclerotic Near-Occlusion of the Carotid Artery.

Authors:  F Cay; B E Cil; S Balcı; E M Arsava; M A Topçuoğlu; A Arat
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Preoperative magnetic resonance plaque imaging and carotid artery stenting: a review.

Authors:  Kiyofumi Yamada; Shinichi Yoshimura; Masanori Kawasaki; Toru Iwama
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2012-05

6.  Initial experience of carotid artery stenting using the Carotid WALLSTENT and FilterWire EZ in Japan.

Authors:  Katsutoshi Takayama; Toshiaki Taoka; Hiroyuki Nakagawa; Kaoru Myouchin; Takeshi Wada; Toshiteru Miyasaka; Masahiko Sakamoto; Akio Fukusumi; Satoru Iwasaki; Ryota Kimura; Shinichiro Kurokawa; Kimihiko Kichikawa
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Initial experience of using the filter protection device during carotid artery stenting in Japan.

Authors:  Katsutoshi Takayama; Hiroyuki Nakagawa; Satoru Iwasaki; Toshiaki Taoka; Toshiteru Miyasaka; Kaoru Myouchin; Takeshi Wada; Masahiko Sakamoto; Akio Fukusumi; Ichiro Nakagawa; Shinichiro Kurokawa; Kimihiko Kichikawa
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2008-08-03

8.  Magnetic resonance plaque imaging to predict the occurrence of the slow-flow phenomenon in carotid artery stenting procedures.

Authors:  Masahiko Sakamoto; Toshiaki Taoka; Hiroyuki Nakagawa; Katsutoshi Takayama; Takeshi Wada; Kaoru Myouchin; Toshiaki Akashi; Toshiteru Miyasaka; Akio Fukusumi; Satoru Iwasaki; Kimihiko Kichikawa
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Vascular resistance in the carotid artery: an in vitro investigation of embolic protection filters.

Authors:  Gail M Siewiorek; Mark H Wholey; Ender A Finol
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 3.464

10.  [Carotid artery stenting technique].

Authors:  J Schofer; K Bijuklic
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.