Literature DB >> 1674060

MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group.

.   

Abstract

The European Carotid Surgery Trial is a multicentre trial of carotid endarterectomy for patients who, after a carotid territory non-disabling ischaemic stroke, transient ischaemic attack, or retinal infarct, are found to have a stenotic lesion in the relevant (ipsilateral) carotid artery. Over the past 10 years 2518 patients have been randomised, and the mean follow-up is now almost 3 years among the 2200 thus far available for analysis of the incidence of strokes that lasted more than 7 days. For the patients with "moderate" (30-69%) stenosis on their prerandomisation angiogram the balance of surgical risk and eventual benefit remains uncertain, and full recruitment continues. For 374 patients with only "mild" (0-29%) stenosis there was little 3-year risk of ipsilateral ischaemic stroke, even in the absence of surgery, so any 3-year benefits of surgery were small, and were outweighed by its early risks. For 778 patients with "severe" (70-99%) stenosis, however, the risks of surgery were significantly outweighed by the later benefits: although 7.5% had a stroke (or died) within 30 days of surgery, during the next 3 years the risks of ipsilateral ischaemic stroke were (by life-table analysis) an extra 2.8% for surgery-allocated and 16.8% for control patients (a sixfold reduction, p less than 0.0001). There was also a small reduction in other strokes, and at 3 years the total risk of surgical death, surgical stroke, ipsilateral ischaemic stroke, or any other stroke was 12.3% for surgery and 21.9% for control (difference 9.6% SD 3.3, 2p less than 0.01). The main concern was to avoid disabling or fatal events, and, among severe stenosis patients, 3.7% had a disabling stroke (or died) within 30 days of surgery, an extra 1.1% surgery versus 8.4% control (p less than 0.0001) had a disabling or fatal ipsilateral ischaemic stroke by 3 years, and the total 3-year risk of any disabling or fatal stroke (or surgical death) was 6.0% surgery versus 11.0% control (overall difference 5.0% SD 2.3, 2p less than 0.05); but, for disabling or fatal stroke the control risks seemed to diminish after the first year, so delay of surgery by just a few months after clinical presentation might make this overall difference non-significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1674060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  310 in total

1.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography and MR imaging of the carotid artery: high-resolution sequences in different acquisition planes.

Authors:  S Aoki; H Nakajima; H Kumagai; T Araki
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Treatment of atherosclerotic disease at the cervical carotid bifurcation: current status and review of the literature.

Authors:  J J Connors; D Seidenwurm; J C Wojak; R W Hurst; M E Jensen; R Wallace; T Tomsick; J Barr; C Kerber; E Russell; G M Nesbit; A J Fox; F Y Tsai
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis.

Authors:  O B Samuels; G J Joseph; M J Lynn; H A Smith; M I Chimowitz
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  When should clinical guidelines be updated?

Authors:  P Shekelle; M P Eccles; J M Grimshaw; S H Woolf
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-21

5.  Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Luca Remonda; Pascal Senn; Alain Barth; Marcel Arnold; Karl-Olof Lövblad; Gerhard Schroth
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Cerebrovascular angioplasty and stenting for the prevention of stroke.

Authors:  J C Chaloupka; J B Weigele; S Mangla; W S Lesley
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.081

7.  Endoscopic approach for carotid artery surgery.

Authors:  F Rubino; R Nahouraii; H Deutsch; W King; W B Inabnet; M Gagner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  L J Kappelle
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  Transient ischaemic attacks : new approaches to management.

Authors:  Ramesh Madhavan; Seemant Chaturvedi
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.749

10.  Automated quantification of carotid artery stenosis on contrast-enhanced MRA data using a deformable vascular tube model.

Authors:  Avan Suinesiaputra; Patrick J H de Koning; Elena Zudilova-Seinstra; Johan H C Reiber; Rob J van der Geest
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.