Literature DB >> 20459195

3D critical plaque wall stress is a better predictor of carotid plaque rupture sites than flow shear stress: An in vivo MRI-based 3D FSI study.

Zhongzhao Teng1, Gador Canton, Chun Yuan, Marina Ferguson, Chun Yang, Xueying Huang, Jie Zheng, Pamela K Woodard, Dalin Tang.   

Abstract

Atherosclerotic plaque rupture leading to stroke is the major cause of long-term disability as well as the third most common cause of mortality. Image-based computational models have been introduced seeking critical mechanical indicators, which may be used for plaque vulnerability assessment. This study extends the previous 2D critical stress concept to 3D by using in vivo magnetic resonance image (MRI) data of human atherosclerotic carotid plaques and 3D fluid-structure interaction (FSI) models to: identify 3D critical plaque wall stress (CPWS) and critical flow shear stress (CFSS) and to investigate their associations with plaque rupture. In vivo MRI data of carotid plaques from 18 patients scheduled for endarterectomy were acquired using histologically validated multicontrast protocols. Of the 18 plaques, histology-confirmed that six had prior rupture (group 1) as evidenced by presence of ulceration. The remaining 12 plaques (group 2) contained no rupture. The 3D multicomponent FSI models were constructed for each plaque to obtain 3D plaque wall stress (PWS) and flow shear stress (FSS) distributions. Three-dimensional CPWS and CFSS, defined as maxima of PWS and FSS from all vulnerable sites, were determined for each plaque to investigate their association with plaque rupture. Slice-based critical PWS and FSS were also calculated for all slices for more detailed analysis and comparison. The mean 3D CPWS of group 1 was 263.44 kPa, which was 100% higher than that from group 2 (132.77, p=0.03984). Five of the six ruptured plaques had 3D CPWS sites, matching the histology-confirmed rupture sites with an 83% agreement. Although the mean 3D CFSS (92.94 dyn/cm(2)) for group 1 was 76% higher than that for group 2 (52.70 dyn/cm(2)), slice-based CFSS showed no significant difference between the two groups. Only two of the six ruptured plaques had 3D CFSS sites matching the histology-confirmed rupture sites with a 33% agreement. CFSS had a good correlation with plaque stenosis severity (R(2)=0.40 with an exponential function fitting 3D CFSS data). This in vivo MRI pilot study using plaques with and without rupture demonstrates that 3D critical plaque wall stress values are more closely associated with atherosclerotic plaque rupture then critical flow shear stresses. Critical wall stress values may become indicators of high risk sites of rupture. Future work with a larger population will establish a possible CPWS-based plaque vulnerability classification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20459195      PMCID: PMC2924579          DOI: 10.1115/1.4001028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  39 in total

Review 1.  Vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque: a multifocal disease.

Authors:  Ward Casscells; Morteza Naghavi; James T Willerson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  A hypothesis for vulnerable plaque rupture due to stress-induced debonding around cellular microcalcifications in thin fibrous caps.

Authors:  Yuliya Vengrenyuk; Stéphane Carlier; Savvas Xanthos; Luis Cardoso; Peter Ganatos; Renu Virmani; Shmuel Einav; Lane Gilchrist; Sheldon Weinbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Geometry of the carotid bifurcation predicts its exposure to disturbed flow.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Lee; Luca Antiga; J David Spence; David A Steinman
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Stress analysis of carotid plaque rupture based on in vivo high resolution MRI.

Authors:  Zhi-Yong Li; Simon Howarth; Rikin A Trivedi; Jean M U-King-Im; Martin J Graves; Andrew Brown; Liqun Wang; Jonathan H Gillard
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Visualization of fibrous cap thickness and rupture in human atherosclerotic carotid plaque in vivo with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  T S Hatsukami; R Ross; N L Polissar; C Yuan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-08-29       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Local maximal stress hypothesis and computational plaque vulnerability index for atherosclerotic plaque assessment.

Authors:  Dalin Tang; Chun Yang; Jie Zheng; Pamela K Woodard; Jeffrey E Saffitz; Joseph D Petruccelli; Gregorio A Sicard; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  3D MRI-based multicomponent FSI models for atherosclerotic plaques.

Authors:  Dalin Tang; Chun Yang; Jie Zheng; Pamela K Woodard; Gregorio A Sicard; Jeffrey E Saffitz; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  In Vivo/Ex Vivo MRI-Based 3D Non-Newtonian FSI Models for Human Atherosclerotic Plaques Compared with Fluid/Wall-Only Models.

Authors:  Chun Yang; Dalin Tang; Chun Yuan; Thomas S Hatsukami; Jie Zheng; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Comput Model Eng Sci       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 1.593

9.  Cataloguing the geometry of the human coronary arteries: a potential tool for predicting risk of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Hui Zhu; Zhaohua Ding; Robert N Piana; Thomas R Gehrig; Morton H Friedman
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 4.164

10.  Characterization of the atherosclerotic carotid bifurcation using MRI, finite element modeling, and histology.

Authors:  M R Kaazempur-Mofrad; A G Isasi; H F Younis; R C Chan; D P Hinton; G Sukhova; G M LaMuraglia; R T Lee; R D Kamm
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.934

View more
  32 in total

1.  A mechanistic analysis of the role of microcalcifications in atherosclerotic plaque stability: potential implications for plaque rupture.

Authors:  Natalia Maldonado; Adreanne Kelly-Arnold; Yuliya Vengrenyuk; Damien Laudier; John T Fallon; Renu Virmani; Luis Cardoso; Sheldon Weinbaum
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Computational modeling of distal protection filters.

Authors:  Gail M Siewiorek; Ender A Finol
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.487

3.  Comparing velocity and fluid shear stress in a stenotic phantom with steady flow: phase-contrast MRI, particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Iman Khodarahmi
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  In vivo serial MRI-based models and statistical methods to quantify sensitivity and specificity of mechanical predictors for carotid plaque rupture: location and beyond.

Authors:  Zheyang Wu; Chun Yang; Dalin Tang
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  IVUS-based computational modeling and planar biaxial artery material properties for human coronary plaque vulnerability assessment.

Authors:  Haofei Liu; Mingchao Cai; Chun Yang; Jie Zheng; Richard Bach; Mehmet H Kural; Kristen L Billiar; David Muccigrosso; Dongsi Lu; Dalin Tang
Journal:  Mol Cell Biomech       Date:  2012-03

6.  Pulse Wave Imaging in Carotid Artery Stenosis Human Patients in Vivo.

Authors:  Ronny X Li; Iason Z Apostolakis; Paul Kemper; Matthew D J McGarry; Ada Ip; Edward S Connolly; James F McKinsey; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Assessment of superficial coronary vessel wall deformation and stress: validation of in silico models and human coronary arteries in vivo.

Authors:  Xinlei Wu; Clemens von Birgelen; Zehang Li; Su Zhang; Jiayue Huang; Fuyou Liang; Yingguang Li; William Wijns; Shengxian Tu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Simultaneous evaluation of plaque stability and ischemic potential of coronary lesions in a fluid-structure interaction analysis.

Authors:  Xinlei Wu; Clemens von Birgelen; Su Zhang; Daixin Ding; Jiayue Huang; Shengxian Tu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  High wall shear stress and spatial gradients in vascular pathology: a review.

Authors:  Jennifer M Dolan; John Kolega; Hui Meng
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  3D MRI-based multicomponent thin layer structure only plaque models for atherosclerotic plaques.

Authors:  Xueying Huang; Chun Yang; Jie Zheng; Richard Bach; David Muccigrosso; Pamela K Woodard; Dalin Tang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.