Literature DB >> 8150732

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the bobtail lizard. II: Interactions with external tones.

C Köppl1, G A Manley.   

Abstract

The response of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions to the presentation of external tones was studied in the Australian bobtail lizard. Three basic types of effects were observed: suppression (a reduction in the emission's amplitude), facilitation (an increase in the emission's amplitude) and frequency shifting. The suppressive effect was highly frequency selective. Iso-suppression tuning curves resembled the rate-threshold tuning curves of the high-frequency population of VIIIth nerve fibres in this species. The frequency with the lowest threshold for suppression corresponded, on average, to the emission's own frequency and did not show any systematic deviation from it. Facilitation of between 2 and 10 dB occurred, but only in response to frequencies within certain narrow ranges, and at sound pressure levels below those that suppressed. The most commonly-observed facilitation range lay between 0.2 and 0.6 octaves above the emission's own frequency and coincided in frequency with a characteristic notch in the iso-suppression tuning curve. In the same narrow frequency range, the input/output functions of amplitude suppression always showed a pronounced increase in slope. The emissions moved their own frequency away from that of an external tone. The observed shifts were comparatively large (up to -330 Hz) and were more pronounced in the downward direction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8150732     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90215-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  9 in total

1.  Frequency clustering in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions from a lizard's ear.

Authors:  Andrej Vilfan; Thomas Duke
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

3.  Effects of salicylates and aminoglycosides on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the Tokay gecko.

Authors:  C E Stewart; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Comparative Auditory Neuroscience: Understanding the Evolution and Function of Ears.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-18

5.  Comparison of otoacoustic emissions within gecko subfamilies: morphological implications for auditory function in lizards.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-07

Review 6.  Otoacoustic Emissions in Non-Mammals.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2022-05-11

7.  Interactions between hair cells shape spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a model of the tokay gecko's cochlea.

Authors:  Michael Gelfand; Oreste Piro; Marcelo O Magnasco; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Bilateral Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions Show Coupling between Active Oscillators in the Two Ears.

Authors:  Yuttana Roongthumskul; Dáibhid Ó Maoiléidigh; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Lizard and frog prestin: evolutionary insight into functional changes.

Authors:  Jie Tang; Jason L Pecka; Bernd Fritzsch; Kirk W Beisel; David Z Z He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.