Literature DB >> 8793506

Spatial selectivity in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea.

J H Frijns1, S L de Snoo, J H ten Kate.   

Abstract

A rotationally symmetric model of electrical stimulation of the guinea pig cochlea with active neural elements is used to study the influence of temporal stimulus parameters and electrode configurations on the spatial selectivity of electrical stimulation by cochlear implants. The width of the excitation patterns is determined with respect to the position of the stimulating electrode pairs in the cochlea. Computed O10 AB values are compared against single fibre data from the cat cochlear nerve as measured by Van den Honert and Stypulkowsky (1987). It turns out that the use of charge-balanced asymmetric rather than symmetric biphasic pulses approximately doubles the number of independent channels that can be applied in a cochlear implant with longitudinal bipolar electrodes, like a configuration with radial electrode pairs using symmetric biphasic pulse stimulation will also do. Finally, the influence on Selectivity of the physiological variation in diameter of the cochlear nerve fibres and of a possible loss of their peripheral processes is studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8793506     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(96)00004-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  32 in total

1.  Evaluation of a high-resolution patient-specific model of the electrically stimulated cochlea.

Authors:  Ahmet Cakir; Robert T Dwyer; Jack H Noble
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-14

2.  Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; Julie A Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-08-12

3.  Modelling encapsulation tissue around cochlear implant electrodes.

Authors:  T Hanekom
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  The development of the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear implant system.

Authors:  James F Patrick; Peter A Busby; Peter J Gibson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

5.  Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; John C Middlebrooks; Ben H Bonham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Optical parameter variability in laser nerve stimulation: a study of pulse duration, repetition rate, and wavelength.

Authors:  Agnella D Izzo; Joseph T Walsh; E Duco Jansen; Mark Bendett; Jim Webb; Heather Ralph; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Psychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Lisa J Stille
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Laser stimulation of auditory neurons: effect of shorter pulse duration and penetration depth.

Authors:  Agnella D Izzo; Joseph T Walsh; Heather Ralph; Jim Webb; Mark Bendett; Jonathon Wells; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Psychophysical and physiological measures of electrical-field interaction in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Lisa J Stille
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.