OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the image quality of time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA (tr-MRA) employing echo-sharing with stochastic trajectories for the bilateral examination of the hands. METHODS: In this institutional review-board approved study, Tr-MRA was compared with multiphasic contrast-enhanced MRA (mp-MRA) featuring sub-systolic venous compression in 20 healthy volunteers at 3.0 T using the following settings: TR/TE: 2.8/1.2 ms, flip angle: 25°, acceleration factor: 4, effective voxel size: 0.9 × 0.8 × 0.9 cm, acquisition time 4.9 s per 3D volume. RESULTS: With tr-MRA the arterial first-pass contrast agent transit is clearly seen. On average the contrast agent arrived 34 s post-injection and reached the proper digital arteries after 44 s. The mean arterio-venous window was 13 s. Bilateral contrast enhancement was asynchronous in 56-62%. On a semiquantitative scale (0 = non-sufficient to 4 = excellent) tr-MRA (mp-MRA) yielded an average ranking of 2.8-3.6 (3.1-3.8) in the greater and intermediate sized segments and 1.3-2.0 (1.6-2.3) in the proper digital arteries. CONCLUSION: Compared with established multiphasic ce-MRA, time-resolved MRA allows a four times faster acquisition. It reflects the natural haemodynamics of the hand arteries with no need for sub-systolic venous compression and may be beneficial in the detection of hand circulation disorders. Image quality is comparable to mp-MRA. In both techniques depiction of the proper digital arteries is limited.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the image quality of time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA (tr-MRA) employing echo-sharing with stochastic trajectories for the bilateral examination of the hands. METHODS: In this institutional review-board approved study, Tr-MRA was compared with multiphasic contrast-enhanced MRA (mp-MRA) featuring sub-systolic venous compression in 20 healthy volunteers at 3.0 T using the following settings: TR/TE: 2.8/1.2 ms, flip angle: 25°, acceleration factor: 4, effective voxel size: 0.9 × 0.8 × 0.9 cm, acquisition time 4.9 s per 3D volume. RESULTS: With tr-MRA the arterial first-pass contrast agent transit is clearly seen. On average the contrast agent arrived 34 s post-injection and reached the proper digital arteries after 44 s. The mean arterio-venous window was 13 s. Bilateral contrast enhancement was asynchronous in 56-62%. On a semiquantitative scale (0 = non-sufficient to 4 = excellent) tr-MRA (mp-MRA) yielded an average ranking of 2.8-3.6 (3.1-3.8) in the greater and intermediate sized segments and 1.3-2.0 (1.6-2.3) in the proper digital arteries. CONCLUSION: Compared with established multiphasic ce-MRA, time-resolved MRA allows a four times faster acquisition. It reflects the natural haemodynamics of the hand arteries with no need for sub-systolic venous compression and may be beneficial in the detection of hand circulation disorders. Image quality is comparable to mp-MRA. In both techniques depiction of the proper digital arteries is limited.
Authors: J T Winterer; K Scheffler; G Paul; M Hauer; O Schäfer; C Altehoefer; J Laubenberger Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2000 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Robin M Heidemann; Mark A Griswold; Nicole Seiberlich; Gunnar Krüger; Stephan A R Kannengiesser; Berthold Kiefer; Graham Wiggins; Lawrence L Wald; Peter M Jakob Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Katja Brauck; Stefan Maderwald; Florian M Vogt; Michael Zenge; Jörg Barkhausen; Christoph U Herborn Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-05-19 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Alex Frydrychowicz; Thorsten A Bley; Jan T Winterer; Andreas Harloff; Mathias Langer; Jürgen Hennig; Michael Markl Journal: MAGMA Date: 2006-08-26 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: R P Lim; M Shapiro; E Y Wang; M Law; J S Babb; L E Rueff; J S Jacob; S Kim; R H Carson; T P Mulholland; G Laub; E M Hecht Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2008-09-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Kambiz Nael; Mayil Krishnam; Stefan G Ruehm; Henrik J Michaely; Gerhard Laub; J Paul Finn Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Stephen J Riederer; Clifton R Haider; Eric A Borisch; Paul T Weavers; Phillip M Young Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 4.813