Literature DB >> 21076904

[Radiation hygiene in medical X-ray imaging. Part 3: radiation exposure of patients and risk assessment].

E A Nekolla1, J Griebel, G Brix.   

Abstract

The frequency of X-ray examinations in Germany and the resulting radiation exposure is amongst the highest in comparison with other European countries. To reduce medical radiation exposure and to safeguard radiation protection regulations, the X-ray ordinance stipulates a justification of each individual X-ray application. The justification principle means that the X-ray application should produce sufficient health benefit to offset the radiation risk. Such a benefit-risk assessment needs an adequate estimation of radiation risk. The aim of this paper is to explain the principles of benefit-risk assessment for different situations (e.g. healthcare and screening). The basics and concepts of radiation effects and radiation epidemiology as well as examples of risk estimation and benefit-risk assessments are given.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21076904     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-010-2074-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  9 in total

1.  [CT radiation exposure risk in Germany].

Authors:  M Galanski; H D Nagel; G Stamm
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2001-10

2.  The LNT-controversy and the concept of "controllable dose".

Authors:  A M Kellerer; E A Nekolla
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 3.  [Radiation hygiene in medical X-ray imaging: part 2: Assessment of radiation exposure and radiation protection measures].

Authors:  G Brix; R Veit; U Häusler
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  [Introduction of a mammography screening program in Germany. Consideration of benefits and risks].

Authors:  E A Nekolla; J Griebel; G Brix
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey.

Authors:  G Brix; H D Nagel; G Stamm; R Veit; U Lechel; J Griebel; M Galanski
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Studies of mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 13: Solid cancer and noncancer disease mortality: 1950-1997.

Authors:  Dale L Preston; Yukiko Shimizu; Donald A Pierce; Akihiko Suyama; Kiyohiko Mabuchi
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998.

Authors:  D L Preston; E Ron; S Tokuoka; S Funamoto; N Nishi; M Soda; K Mabuchi; K Kodama
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Radiation exposures of cancer patients from medical X-rays: how relevant are they for individual patients and population exposure?

Authors:  Gunnar Brix; Sven Nissen-Meyer; Ursula Lechel; Johannes Nissen-Meyer; Jürgen Griebel; Elke A Nekolla; Christoph Becker; Maximilian Reiser
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Statistical limitations in relation to sample size.

Authors:  C E Land
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  [Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Tracer kinetics and radiation hygienic principles].

Authors:  G Brix; J Griebel; S Delorme
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Ablation of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia using zero-fluoroscopy approach with equivalent efficacy and less fatigue: A multicenter comparative study.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Guang Zhi Chen; Yan Yao; Yang Bai; Hui Min Chu; Ke Zhong Ma; Reginald Liew; Hao Liu; Guo Qiang Zhong; Yu Mei Xue; Shu Lin Wu; Yi Fu Li; Chun Xia Zhao; Qi Gong Liu; Li Lin; Lin Wang; Dao Wen Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.889

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.