Literature DB >> 18722727

Radiation exposures of cancer patients from medical X-rays: how relevant are they for individual patients and population exposure?

Gunnar Brix1, Sven Nissen-Meyer, Ursula Lechel, Johannes Nissen-Meyer, Jürgen Griebel, Elke A Nekolla, Christoph Becker, Maximilian Reiser.   

Abstract

X-ray procedures have a substantial impact not only on patient care but also on man-made radiation exposure. Since a reliable risk-benefit analysis of medical X-rays can only be performed for diagnosis-related groups of patients, we determined specific exposure data for patients with the ten most common types of cancer. For all patients with the considered cancers undergoing medical X-ray procedures in a maximum-care hospital between 2000 and 2005, patient- and examination-specific data were retrieved from the hospital/radiology information system. From this data, the cumulative 5-year effective dose was estimated for each patient as well as the mean annual effective dose per patient and the mean patient observation time for each cancer site. In total, 151,439 radiographic, fluoroscopic, and CT procedures, carried out in 15,866 cancer patients (age, 62+/-13 years), were evaluated. The mean 5-year cumulative dose varied between 8.6 mSv (prostate cancer) and 68.8 mSv (pancreas cancer). Due to an increasing use of CT scans, the mean annual effective dose per patient increased from 13.6 to 18.2 mSv during the 6-year period. Combining the results obtained in this study for a particular hospital with cancer incidence data for Germany, we estimated that cancer patients having X-ray studies constitute at least 1% of the population but receive more than 10% of the total effective dose related to all medical X-ray procedures performed nationwide per year. A large fraction of this dose is radiobiologically ineffective due to the reduced life expectancy of cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18722727     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  11 in total

1.  [Radiation hygiene in medical X-ray imaging. Part 3: radiation exposure of patients and risk assessment].

Authors:  E A Nekolla; J Griebel; G Brix
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  [CT diagnostics: too much of a good thing is risky].

Authors:  G Brix
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Towards the clinical implementation of iterative low-dose cone-beam CT reconstruction in image-guided radiation therapy: cone/ring artifact correction and multiple GPU implementation.

Authors:  Hao Yan; Xiaoyu Wang; Feng Shi; Ti Bai; Michael Folkerts; Laura Cervino; Steve B Jiang; Xun Jia
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Temporal trends in the use of diagnostic imaging for inpatients with pancreatic conditions: How much ionizing radiation are we using?

Authors:  Alexsander K Bressan; Jean-Francois Ouellet; Divine Tanyingoh; Elijah Dixon; Gilaad G Kaplan; Sean C Grondin; Robert P Myers; Rachid Mohamed; Chad G Ball
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Ionizing radiation in abdominal CT: unindicated multiphase scans are an important source of medically unnecessary exposure.

Authors:  Kristie M Guite; J Louis Hinshaw; Frank N Ranallo; Mary J Lindstrom; Fred T Lee
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  The impact of an acute care surgery clinical care pathway for suspected appendicitis on the use of CT in the emergency department.

Authors:  Chad G Ball; Elijah Dixon; Anthony R MacLean; Gilaad G Kaplan; Lynn Nicholson; Francis R Sutherland
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Radiation dose from computed tomography in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis: how much is too much?

Authors:  Chad G Ball; Camilo Correa-Gallego; Thomas J Howard; Nicholas J Zyromski; Michael G House; Henry A Pitt; Atilla Nakeeb; Christian M Schmidt; Fatih Akisik; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Current knowledge on tumour induction by computed tomography should be carefully used.

Authors:  Cristian Candela-Juan; Alegría Montoro; Enrique Ruiz-Martínez; Juan Ignacio Villaescusa; Luis Martí-Bonmatí
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Optimised low-dose multidetector CT protocol for children with cranial deformity.

Authors:  Jose Luis Vazquez; Miguel Angel Pombar; Jose Manuel Pumar; Victor Miguel del Campo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Radiation exposure from CT examinations in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshito Tsushima; Ayako Taketomi-Takahashi; Hiroyuki Takei; Hidenori Otake; Keigo Endo
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.