Literature DB >> 12968934

Studies of mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 13: Solid cancer and noncancer disease mortality: 1950-1997.

Dale L Preston1, Yukiko Shimizu, Donald A Pierce, Akihiko Suyama, Kiyohiko Mabuchi.   

Abstract

This continues the series of general reports on mortality in the cohort of atomic bomb survivors followed up by the Radiation Effects Research Foundation. This cohort includes 86,572 people with individual dose estimates, 60% of whom have doses of at least 5 mSv. We consider mortality for solid cancer and for noncancer diseases with 7 additional years of follow-up. There have been 9,335 deaths from solid cancer and 31,881 deaths from noncancer diseases during the 47-year follow-up. Of these, 19% of the solid cancer and 15% of the noncancer deaths occurred during the latest 7 years. We estimate that about 440 (5%) of the solid cancer deaths and 250 (0.8%) of the noncancer deaths were associated with the radiation exposure. The excess solid cancer risks appear to be linear in dose even for doses in the 0 to 150-mSv range. While excess rates for radiation-related cancers increase throughout the study period, a new finding is that relative risks decline with increasing attained age, as well as being highest for those exposed as children as noted previously. A useful representative value is that for those exposed at age 30 the solid cancer risk is elevated by 47% per sievert at age 70. There is no significant city difference in either the relative or absolute excess solid cancer risk. Site-specific analyses highlight the difficulties, and need for caution, in distinguishing between site-specific relative risks. These analyses also provide insight into the difficulties in interpretation and generalization of LSS estimates of age-at-exposure effects. The evidence for radiation effects on noncancer mortality remains strong, with risks elevated by about 14% per sievert during the last 30 years of follow-up. Statistically significant increases are seen for heart disease, stroke, digestive diseases, and respiratory diseases. The noncancer data are consistent with some non-linearity in the dose response owing to the substantial uncertainties in the data. There is no direct evidence of radiation effects for doses less than about 0.5 Sv. While there are no statistically significant variations in noncancer relative risks with age, age at exposure, or sex, the estimated effects are comparable to those seen for cancer. Lifetime risk summaries are used to examine uncertainties of the LSS noncancer disease findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12968934     DOI: 10.1667/rr3049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  264 in total

Review 1.  Experimental radiation-induced heart disease: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Marjan Boerma
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Radiation dose associated with renal failure mortality: a potential pathway to partially explain increased cardiovascular disease mortality observed after whole-body irradiation.

Authors:  Michael Jacob Adams; Eric J Grant; Kazunori Kodama; Yukiko Shimizu; Fumiyoshi Kasagi; Akihiko Suyama; Ritsu Sakata; Masazumi Akahoshi
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  The LNT Debate in Radiation Protection: Science vs. Policy.

Authors:  Kenneth L Mossman
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 4.  Exposing the thyroid to radiation: a review of its current extent, risks, and implications.

Authors:  Bridget Sinnott; Elaine Ron; Arthur B Schneider
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 5.  Evaluation and follow-up of patients with urinary lithiasis: minimizing radiation exposure.

Authors:  Elias S Hyams; Ojas Shah
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Comparison of mortality and incidence solid cancer risk after radiation exposure in the Techa River Cohort.

Authors:  M Eidemüller; E Ostroumova; L Krestinina; S Epiphanova; A Akleyev; P Jacob
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 7.  Incidental findings found in "healthy" volunteers during imaging performed for research: current legal and ethical implications.

Authors:  T C Booth; A Jackson; J M Wardlaw; S A Taylor; A D Waldman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  [Radiation hygiene in medical X-ray imaging. Part 3: radiation exposure of patients and risk assessment].

Authors:  E A Nekolla; J Griebel; G Brix
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 9.  Radiation as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  John E Baker; John E Moulder; John W Hopewell
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 10.  Assessment of the risk for developing a second malignancy from scattered and secondary radiation in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.