Literature DB >> 7333252

Statistical limitations in relation to sample size.

C E Land.   

Abstract

The statistical difficulties of estimating cancer risks from low doses of a carcinogen are illustrated by examples from radiation carcinogenesis. Although more is known about dose-response relationships for ionizing radiation than for any other environmental carcinogen, estimates of cancer risk from low radiation doses have been extremely controversial; disagreements by factors of 100 or more are not uncommon. Direct estimation, based on data from populations exposed to low doses, is usually impracticable because of sample size requirements. Curve-fitting analyses, by which higher dose data determine lower dose risk estimates, require simple dose-response models if the estimates are to be statistically stable. The current level of knowledge about biological mechanisms of carcinogenesis dose not usually permit the confident assumption of a simple model, however; thus frequently the choice is between unstable risk estimates obtained using general models and statistically stable estimates whose stability depends on arbitrary model assumptions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7333252      PMCID: PMC1568793          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.814215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  8 in total

1.  Problems involved in detecting increased malignancy rates in areas of high natural radiation background.

Authors:  E E Pochin
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 1.316

2.  The question of radiation causation of cancer in Hanford workers.

Authors:  J W Gofman
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Review of report by Mancuso, Stewart and Kneale of radiation exposure of Hanford workers.

Authors:  G B Hutchison; B MacMahon; S Jablon; C E Land
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  Estimating cancer risks from low doses of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  C E Land
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-09-12       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  An analysis of the mortality of workers in a nuclear facility.

Authors:  E S Gilbert; S Marks
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Radiation exposures of Hanford workers dying from cancer and other causes.

Authors:  T F Mancuso; A Stewart; G Kneale
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Incidence of leukemia in atomic bomb survivors belonging to a fixed cohort in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1950--71. Radiation dose, years after exposure, age at exposure, and type of leukemia.

Authors:  M Ichimaru; T Ishimaru; J L Belsky
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Breast cancer risk from low-dose exposures to ionizing radiation: results of parallel analysis of three exposed populations of women.

Authors:  C E Land; J D Boice; R E Shore; J E Norman; M Tokunaga
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 13.506

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  [Radiation hygiene in medical X-ray imaging. Part 3: radiation exposure of patients and risk assessment].

Authors:  E A Nekolla; J Griebel; G Brix
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Coronary artery calcification screening: estimated radiation dose and cancer risk.

Authors:  Kwang Pyo Kim; Andrew J Einstein; Amy Berrington de González
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-13

3.  Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT: Radiation Risk and Benefit-Risk Assessment for Different Screening Scenarios.

Authors:  Elke A Nekolla; Gunnar Brix; Jürgen Griebel
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-01

4.  Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations.

Authors:  Sander Greenland; Stephen J Senn; Kenneth J Rothman; John B Carlin; Charles Poole; Steven N Goodman; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 8.082

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.