Literature DB >> 15717183

[Introduction of a mammography screening program in Germany. Consideration of benefits and risks].

E A Nekolla1, J Griebel, G Brix.   

Abstract

For women between 50 and 70 years of age, X-ray mammography presently represents the most effective method for early breast cancer detection. It is commonly accepted that quality assured mammography examinations conducted at regular intervals can reduce mortality from breast cancer. In the year 2002, the German Bundestag agreed to the implementation of a mammography screening program for Germany based on the European guidelines. The effectiveness of a mammography screening program is controversially discussed and two of the most commonly cited hazards are the occurrence of false-positive results and the so-called overdiagnosis. Another issue of criticism is the radiation risk due to the mammography examinations. However, in women aged 50-70 years the radiation risk has no substantial importance. In contrast to the present situation in Germany in which opportunistic screening is widespread, standardized quality assured screening will guarantee that false-positive rates are kept as low as possible and that further assessment diagnostics are effective and minimally invasive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15717183     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-005-1171-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  32 in total

Review 1.  Assessing the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  K Armstrong; A Eisen; B Weber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  O Olsen; P C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-10-20       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Twenty-year follow-up of the breast cancers diagnosed during the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project.

Authors:  C R Smart; C Byrne; R A Smith; L Garfinkel; A H Letton; G D Dodd; O H Beahrs
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable?

Authors:  P C Gøtzsche; O Olsen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Incidence of female breast cancer among atomic bomb survivors, 1950-1985.

Authors:  M Tokunaga; C E Land; S Tokuoka; I Nishimori; M Soda; S Akiba
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Cancer incidence among medical diagnostic X-ray workers in China, 1950 to 1985.

Authors:  J X Wang; P D Inskip; J D Boice; B X Li; J Y Zhang; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1990-05-15       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Nation-wide breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: support for breast-cancer mortality reduction. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening (NETB).

Authors:  H J De Koning; J Fracheboud; R Boer; A L Verbeek; H J Collette; J H Hendriks; B M van Ineveld; A E de Bruyn; P J van der Maas
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1995-03-16       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial.

Authors:  I Andersson; K Aspegren; L Janzon; T Landberg; K Lindholm; F Linell; O Ljungberg; J Ranstam; B Sigfússon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-15

9.  Mortality from breast cancer after irradiation during fluoroscopic examinations in patients being treated for tuberculosis.

Authors:  A B Miller; G R Howe; G J Sherman; J P Lindsay; M J Yaffe; P J Dinner; H A Risch; D L Preston
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Breast cancer screening programmes: the development of a monitoring and evaluation system.

Authors:  N E Day; D R Williams; K T Khaw
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Radiation hygiene in medical X-ray imaging. Part 3: radiation exposure of patients and risk assessment].

Authors:  E A Nekolla; J Griebel; G Brix
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  [The role of epidemiological quality parameters in a mammography screening programme].

Authors:  N Becker
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  [Radiation exposure of patients from diagnostic and interventional X-ray procedures. Facts, assessment and trends].

Authors:  G Brix; E Nekolla; J Griebel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.635

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.