Literature DB >> 18199910

Assessment of organ-specific neutron equivalent doses in proton therapy using computational whole-body age-dependent voxel phantoms.

Christina Zacharatou Jarlskog1, Choonik Lee, Wesley E Bolch, X George Xu, Harald Paganetti.   

Abstract

Proton beams used for radiotherapy will produce neutrons when interacting with matter. The purpose of this study was to quantify the equivalent dose to tissue due to secondary neutrons in pediatric and adult patients treated by proton therapy for brain lesions. Assessment of the equivalent dose to organs away from the target requires whole-body geometrical information. Furthermore, because the patient geometry depends on age at exposure, age-dependent representations are also needed. We implemented age-dependent phantoms into our proton Monte Carlo dose calculation environment. We considered eight typical radiation fields, two of which had been previously used to treat pediatric patients. The other six fields were additionally considered to allow a systematic study of equivalent doses as a function of field parameters. For all phantoms and all fields, we simulated organ-specific equivalent neutron doses and analyzed for each organ (1) the equivalent dose due to neutrons as a function of distance to the target; (2) the equivalent dose due to neutrons as a function of patient age; (3) the equivalent dose due to neutrons as a function of field parameters; and (4) the ratio of contributions to secondary dose from the treatment head versus the contribution from the patient's body tissues. This work reports organ-specific equivalent neutron doses for up to 48 organs in a patient. We demonstrate quantitatively how organ equivalent doses for adult and pediatric patients vary as a function of patient's age, organ and field parameters. Neutron doses increase with increasing range and modulation width but decrease with field size (as defined by the aperture). We analyzed the ratio of neutron dose contributions from the patient and from the treatment head, and found that neutron-equivalent doses fall off rapidly as a function of distance from the target, in agreement with experimental data. It appears that for the fields used in this study, the neutron dose lateral to the field is smaller than the reported scattered photon doses in a typical intensity-modulated photon treatment. Most importantly, our study shows that neutron doses to specific organs depend considerably on the patient's age and body stature. The younger the patient, the higher the dose deposited due to neutrons. Given the fact that the risk also increases with decreasing patient age, this factor needs to be taken into account when treating pediatric patients of very young ages and/or of small body size. The neutron dose from a course of proton therapy treatment (assuming 70 Gy in 30 fractions) could potentially (depending on patient's age, organ, treatment site and area of CT scan) be equivalent to up to approximately 30 CT scans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18199910      PMCID: PMC2680614          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/3/012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  33 in total

1.  Accurate Monte Carlo simulations for nozzle design, commissioning and quality assurance for a proton radiation therapy facility.

Authors:  H Paganetti; H Jiang; S Y Lee; H M Kooy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Relative biological effectiveness (RBE), quality factor (Q), and radiation weighting factor (w(R)). A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2003

3.  Out-of-field dose equivalents delivered by proton therapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Wroe; Anatoly Rosenfeld; Reinhard Schulte
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  VIP-Man: an image-based whole-body adult male model constructed from color photographs of the Visible Human Project for multi-particle Monte Carlo calculations.

Authors:  X G Xu; T C Chao; A Bozkurt
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  Secondary neutron dose during proton therapy using spot scanning.

Authors:  Uwe Schneider; Stefano Agosteo; Eros Pedroni; Jürgen Besserer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Potential reduction of the incidence of radiation-induced second cancers by using proton beams in the treatment of pediatric tumors.

Authors:  Raymond Miralbell; Antony Lomax; Laura Cella; Uwe Schneider
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Andrzej Niemierko; Marek Ancukiewicz; Leo E Gerweck; Michael Goitein; Jay S Loeffler; Herman D Suit
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  Radiation-induced second cancers: the impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT.

Authors:  Eric J Hall; Cheng-Shie Wuu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  Henry S. Kaplan Distinguished Scientist Award 2003. The crooked shall be made straight; dose-response relationships for carcinogenesis.

Authors:  E J Hall
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.694

10.  Genetic effects of radiotherapy for childhood cancer: gonadal dose reconstruction.

Authors:  Marilyn Stovall; Sarah S Donaldson; Rita E Weathers; Leslie L Robison; Ann C Mertens; Jeanette Falck Winther; Jorgen H Olsen; John D Boice
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 8.013

View more
  24 in total

1.  Estimate of the uncertainties in the relative risk of secondary malignant neoplasms following proton therapy and intensity-modulated photon therapy.

Authors:  Jonas D Fontenot; Charles Bloch; David Followill; Uwe Titt; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Predicted risks of second malignant neoplasm incidence and mortality due to secondary neutrons in a girl and boy receiving proton craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Anita Mahajan; Dragan Mirkovic; Rui Zhang; Annelise Giebeler; David Kornguth; Mark Harvey; Shiao Woo; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  An analytic model of neutron ambient dose equivalent and equivalent dose for proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Angélica Pérez-Andújar; Jonas D Fontenot; Phillip J Taddei; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Assessment of out-of-field absorbed dose and equivalent dose in proton fields.

Authors:  Ben Clasie; Andrew Wroe; Hanne Kooy; Nicolas Depauw; Jay Flanz; Harald Paganetti; Anatoly Rosenfeld
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  PET/CT-guided treatment planning for paediatric cancer patients: a simulation study of proton and conventional photon therapy.

Authors:  J S Kornerup; N P Brodin; T Björk-Eriksson; C Birk Christensen; A Kiil-Berthelsen; M C Aznar; C Hollensen; E Markova; P Munck Af Rosenschöld
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Evaluation of energy deposition and secondary particle production in proton therapy of brain using a slab head phantom.

Authors:  Sayyed Bijan Jia; Mohammad Hadi Hadizadeh; Ali Asghar Mowlavi; Mahdy Ebrahimi Loushab
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-05-01

7.  Comparison of out-of-field photon doses in 6 MV IMRT and neutron doses in proton therapy for adult and pediatric patients.

Authors:  Basit S Athar; Bryan Bednarz; Joao Seco; Cindy Hancox; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Assessment of the risk for developing a second malignancy from scattered and secondary radiation in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  ANALYTICAL MODEL TO ESTIMATE EQUIVALENT DOSE FROM INTERNAL NEUTRONS IN PROTON THERAPY OF CHILDREN WITH INTRACRANIAL TUMORS.

Authors:  Kyle J Gallagher; Phillip J Taddei
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 0.972

10.  Reduction of the secondary neutron dose in passively scattered proton radiotherapy, using an optimized pre-collimator/collimator.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Carl D Elliston; Eric J Hall; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.