Literature DB >> 21075559

Effect of immobilization and performance status on intrafraction motion for stereotactic lung radiotherapy: analysis of 133 patients.

Winnie Li1, Thomas G Purdie, Mojgan Taremi, Sharon Fung, Anthony Brade, B C John Cho, Andrew Hope, Alexander Sun, David A Jaffray, Andrea Bezjak, Jean-Pierre Bissonnette.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess intrafractional geometric accuracy of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) patients treated with volumetric image guidance. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment setup accuracy was analyzed in 133 SBRT patients treated via research ethics board-approved protocols. For each fraction, a localization cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was acquired for soft-tissue registration to the internal target volume, followed by a couch adjustment for positional discrepancies greater than 3 mm, verified with a second CBCT scan. CBCT scans were also performed at intrafraction and end fraction. Patient positioning data from 2047 CBCT scans were recorded to determine systematic (Σ) and random (σ) uncertainties, as well as planning target volume margins. Data were further stratified and analyzed by immobilization method (evacuated cushion [n=75], evacuated cushion plus abdominal compression [n=33], or chest board [n=25]) and by patients' Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS): 0 (n=31), 1 (n=70), or 2 (n=32).
RESULTS: Using CBCT internal target volume was matched within ±3 mm in 16% of all fractions at localization, 89% at verification, 72% during treatment, and 69% after treatment. Planning target volume margins required to encompass residual setup errors after couch corrections (verification CBCT scans) were 4 mm, and they increased to 5 mm with target intrafraction motion (post-treatment CBCT scans). Small differences (<1 mm) in the cranial-caudal direction of target position were observed between the immobilization cohorts in the localization, verification, intrafraction, and post-treatment CBCT scans (p<0.01). Positional drift varied according to patient PS, with the PS 1 and 2 cohorts drifting out of position by mid treatment more than the PS 0 cohort in the cranial-caudal direction (p=0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Image guidance ensures high geometric accuracy for lung SBRT irrespective of immobilization method or PS. A 5-mm setup margin suffices to address intrafraction motion. This setup margin may be further reduced by strategies such as frequent image guidance or volumetric arc therapy to correct or limit intrafraction motion.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21075559     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  26 in total

1.  Dosimetric effects of roll rotational setup errors on lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Jaegi Lee; Jung-In Kim; Sung-Joon Ye; Hak Jae Kim; Joel Carlson; Jong Min Park
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Alternatives to surgery in early stage disease-stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Authors:  Meredith Elana Giuliani; Andrea Bezjak
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2013-10

3.  Influence of different treatment techniques and clinical factors over the intrafraction variation on lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Authors:  M Rico; E Martínez; S Pellejero; B Bermejo; P Navarrete; M Barrado; M Campo; F Mañeru; E Villafranca; J Aristu
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Clinical implementation of intrafraction cone beam computed tomography imaging during lung tumor stereotactic ablative radiation therapy.

Authors:  Ruijiang Li; Bin Han; Bowen Meng; Peter G Maxim; Lei Xing; Albert C Koong; Maximilian Diehn; Billy W Loo
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: setup reproducibility with novel arms-down immobilization.

Authors:  Karen Moore; Claire Paterson; Jonathan Hicks; Stephen Harrow; Mark McJury
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Image acquisition optimization of a limited-angle intrafraction verification (LIVE) system for lung radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yawei Zhang; Xinchen Deng; Fang-Fang Yin; Lei Ren
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Double CT imaging can measure the respiratory movement of small pulmonary tumors during stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ge Shen; Ying-Jie Wang; Hong-Guo Sheng; Xiao-Ping Duan; Jun-Liang Wang; Wei-Jing Zhang; Zhen-Shan Zhou; Guang-Ying Zhu; Ting-Yi Xia
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  A Survey of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Korea.

Authors:  Sun Hyun Bae; Mi-Sook Kim; Won Il Jang; Chul-Seung Kay; Woochul Kim; Eun Seog Kim; Jin Ho Kim; Jin Hee Kim; Kwang Mo Yang; Kyu Chan Lee; A Ram Chang; Sunmi Jo
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 4.679

Review 9.  Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in the UK: current status and developments.

Authors:  P Jain; A Baker; G Distefano; A J D Scott; G J Webster; M Q Hatton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Comparative analysis of thermoplastic masks versus vacuum cushions in stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Authors:  Arturo Navarro-Martin; Jon Cacicedo; Olwen Leaman; Ismael Sancho; Elvira García; Valentin Navarro; Ferran Guedea
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.