Literature DB >> 11704237

The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect.

L Zhao1, C Chubb.   

Abstract

Recently, Webster and MacLin demonstrated a face-distortion after-effect (FDAE) for both upright and inverted faces: adaptation to a distorted face makes a normal face appear distorted in the direction opposite to the adapting direction. Neurophysiological studies (e.g. Experimental Brain Research 65 (1986) 38) show that face-selective neurons in the superior temporal sulcus (STS) are remarkably size-invariant in their responses. If the site of adaptation underlying the FDAE is the homologous neuron population in human vision, then the FDAE should also be highly tolerant to changes in size between adapting and test faces. Here, we test this prediction. Observers were adapted to distorted upright/inverted faces of three different sizes (3.3 degrees x 3.7 degrees, 6.6 degrees x 7.5 degrees, and 13.1 degrees x 14.8 degrees ). For adapting faces of all three sizes, observers adjusted test faces of all three sizes until they appeared normal. Significant FDAEs were observed in all conditions. For both upright and inverted faces, FDAEs were approximately twice as strong when adapting and test faces were the same size than when they differed by even a single octave in size. The magnitudes of FDAEs were comparable for upright and inverted faces. The larger FDAEs for same-size adapting and test faces suggest that part of the FDAE derives from a neuron population with narrow size-tuning. However, the significant FDAEs obtained for adapting and test images differing by two octaves implicate a different neuron population with broad size-tuning, possibly the human homolog of the face-selective neuron population in monkey STS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11704237     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00202-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  42 in total

1.  Eye direction aftereffect.

Authors:  Jun'ichiro Seyama; Ruth S Nagayama
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-09-18

2.  Adaptation to astigmatic blur.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry Thibos; Arthur Bradley; Michael Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Gillian Rhodes; Kai-Markus Müller; Linda Jeffery
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Selectivity for the configural cues that identify the gender, ethnicity, and identity of faces in human cortex.

Authors:  Minna Ng; Vivian M Ciaramitaro; Stuart Anstis; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Factors contributing to the adaptation aftereffects of facial expression.

Authors:  Andrea Butler; Ipek Oruc; Christopher J Fox; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Face adaptation does not improve performance on search or discrimination tasks.

Authors:  Minna Ng; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Retinotopy of the face aftereffect.

Authors:  Seyed-Reza Afraz; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Examinations of identity invariance in facial expression adaptation.

Authors:  Melissa Ellamil; Joshua M Susskind; Adam K Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Visual adaptation of the perception of "life": animacy is a basic perceptual dimension of faces.

Authors:  Kami Koldewyn; Patricia Hanus; Benjamin Balas
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08

10.  Development of perceptual expertise in emotion recognition.

Authors:  Seth D Pollak; Michael Messner; Doris J Kistler; Jeffrey F Cohn
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.