Literature DB >> 21040870

Breast MRI in community practice: equipment and imaging techniques at facilities in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Wendy B DeMartini1, Laura Ichikawa, Bonnie C Yankaskas, Diana Buist, Karla Kerlikowske, Berta Geller, Tracy Onega, Robert D Rosenberg, Constance D Lehman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: MRI is increasingly used for the detection of breast carcinoma. Little is known about breast MRI techniques among community practice facilities. The aim of this study was to evaluate equipment and acquisition techniques used by community facilities across the United States, including compliance with minimum standards by the ACRIN® 6667 Trial and the European Society of Breast Imaging.
METHODS: Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium facilities performing breast MRI were identified and queried by survey regarding breast MRI equipment and technical parameters. Variables included scanner field strength, coil type, acquisition coverage, slice thickness, and the timing of the initial postcontrast sequence. Results were tallied and percentages of facilities meeting ACRIN® and European Society of Breast Imaging standards were calculated.
RESULTS: From 23 facilities performing breast MRI, results were obtained from 14 (61%) facilities with 16 MRI scanners reporting 18 imaging parameters. Compliance with equipment recommendations of ≥1.5-T field strength was 94% and of a dedicated breast coil was 100%. Eighty-three percent of acquisitions used bilateral postcontrast techniques, and 78% used slice thickness≤3 mm. The timing of initial postcontrast sequences ranged from 58 seconds to 8 minutes 30 seconds, with 63% meeting recommendations for completion within 4 minutes.
CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all surveyed facilities met ACRIN and European Society of Breast Imaging standards for breast MRI equipment. The majority met standards for acquisition parameters, although techniques varied, in particular for the timing of initial postcontrast imaging. Further guidelines by the ACR Breast MRI Accreditation Program will be of importance in facilitating standardized and high-quality breast MRI.
Copyright © 2010 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21040870      PMCID: PMC2994070          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.06.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  49 in total

1.  Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in Fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard.

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Gian M Giuseppetti; Pietro Panizza; Massimo Bazzocchi; Alfonso Fausto; Giovanni Simonetti; Vincenzo Lattanzio; Alessandro Del Maschio
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  The ACR's Mammography Accreditation Program: ten years of experience since MQSA.

Authors:  Judy M Destouet; Lawrence W Bassett; Martin J Yaffe; Priscilla F Butler; Pamela A Wilcox
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  MRI detection of distinct incidental cancer in women with primary breast cancer studied in IBMC 6883.

Authors:  Mitchell D Schnall; Jeffery Blume; David A Bluemke; Gia A Deangelis; Nanette Debruhl; Steven Harms; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Nola Hylton; Christiane K Kuhl; Etta D Pisano; Petrina Causer; Stuart J Schnitt; Stanley F Smazal; Carol B Stelling; Constance Lehman; Paul T Weatherall; Constantine A Gatsonis
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  MR imaging of the breast: technical approach and clinical experience.

Authors:  S E Harms; D P Flamig
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging--guided surgery in the evaluation of patients with early-stage breast cancer for breast conservation treatment.

Authors:  J E Tan; S G Orel; M D Schnall; D J Schultz; L J Solin
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.339

6.  Role of breast magnetic resonance imaging in determining breast as a source of unknown metastatic lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  R S Henry-Tillman; S E Harms; K C Westbrook; S Korourian; V S Klimberg
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  MRI of occult breast carcinoma in a high-risk population.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Morris; Laura Liberman; Douglas J Ballon; Mark Robson; Andrea F Abramson; Alexandra Heerdt; D David Dershaw
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment.

Authors:  K Schelfout; M Van Goethem; E Kersschot; C Colpaert; A M Schelfhout; P Leyman; I Verslegers; I Biltjes; J Van Den Haute; J P Gillardin; W Tjalma; J C Van Der Auwera; P Buytaert; A De Schepper
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.424

9.  MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Constantine Gatsonis; Christiane K Kuhl; R Edward Hendrick; Etta D Pisano; Lucy Hanna; Sue Peacock; Stanley F Smazal; Daniel D Maki; Thomas B Julian; Elizabeth R DePeri; David A Bluemke; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy.

Authors:  S G Orel; M D Schnall; C M Powell; M G Hochman; L J Solin; B L Fowble; M H Torosian; E F Rosato
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  8 in total

1.  Breast MRI BI-RADS assessments and abnormal interpretation rates by clinical indication in US community practices.

Authors:  Christoph I Lee; Laura Ichikawa; Michele C Rochelle; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti; Brian L Sprague; Wendy B DeMartini; Karen J Wernli; Bonnie N Joe; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Novel High Spatiotemporal Resolution Versus Standard-of-Care Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: Comparison of Image Quality.

Authors:  Courtney K Morrison; Leah C Henze Bancroft; Wendy B DeMartini; James H Holmes; Kang Wang; Ryan J Bosca; Frank R Korosec; Roberta M Strigel
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Screening Breast MRI Outcomes in Routine Clinical Practice: Comparison to BI-RADS Benchmarks.

Authors:  Roberta M Strigel; Jennifer Rollenhagen; Elizabeth S Burnside; Mai Elezaby; Amy M Fowler; Frederick Kelcz; Lonie Salkowski; Wendy B DeMartini
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Polymer film-nanoparticle composites as new multimodality, non-migrating breast biopsy markers.

Authors:  Jonah A Kaplan; Mark W Grinstaff; B Nicolas Bloch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Guideline-inconsistent breast cancer screening for women over 50: a vignette-based survey.

Authors:  Hajar Kadivar; Barbara A Goff; William R Phillips; C Holly A Andrilla; Alfred O Berg; Laura-Mae Baldwin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Breast Cancer Screening With Mammography Plus Ultrasonography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women 50 Years or Younger at Diagnosis and Treated With Breast Conservation Therapy.

Authors:  Nariya Cho; Wonshik Han; Boo-Kyung Han; Min Sun Bae; Eun Sook Ko; Seok Jin Nam; Eun Young Chae; Jong Won Lee; Sung Hun Kim; Bong Joo Kang; Byung Joo Song; Eun-Kyung Kim; Hee Jung Moon; Seung Il Kim; Sun Mi Kim; Eunyoung Kang; Yunhee Choi; Hak Hee Kim; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 31.777

7.  Development and Implementation of an Algorithm to Guide MRI Screening in Patients With a Personal History of Treated Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Roberta M Strigel; Erin Bravo; Amye J Tevaarwerk; Bethany M Anderson; Amy L Stella; Heather B Neuman
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Evaluating surveillance breast imaging and biopsy in older breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Julie Weiss; Roberta Diflorio; Todd Mackenzie; Martha Goodrich; Steven Poplack
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-10-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.