Literature DB >> 17392300

MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer.

Constance D Lehman1, Constantine Gatsonis, Christiane K Kuhl, R Edward Hendrick, Etta D Pisano, Lucy Hanna, Sue Peacock, Stanley F Smazal, Daniel D Maki, Thomas B Julian, Elizabeth R DePeri, David A Bluemke, Mitchell D Schnall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Even after careful clinical and mammographic evaluation, cancer is found in the contralateral breast in up to 10% of women who have received treatment for unilateral breast cancer. We conducted a study to determine whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could improve on clinical breast examination and mammography in detecting contralateral breast cancer soon after the initial diagnosis of unilateral breast cancer.
METHODS: A total of 969 women with a recent diagnosis of unilateral breast cancer and no abnormalities on mammographic and clinical examination of the contralateral breast underwent breast MRI. The diagnosis of MRI-detected cancer was confirmed by means of biopsy within 12 months after study entry. The absence of breast cancer was determined by means of biopsy, the absence of positive findings on repeat imaging and clinical examination, or both at 1 year of follow-up.
RESULTS: MRI detected clinically and mammographically occult breast cancer in the contralateral breast in 30 of 969 women who were enrolled in the study (3.1%). The sensitivity of MRI in the contralateral breast was 91%, and the specificity was 88%. The negative predictive value of MRI was 99%. A biopsy was performed on the basis of a positive MRI finding in 121 of the 969 women (12.5%), 30 of whom had specimens that were positive for cancer (24.8%); 18 of the 30 specimens were positive for invasive cancer. The mean diameter of the invasive tumors detected was 10.9 mm. The additional number of cancers detected was not influenced by breast density, menopausal status, or the histologic features of the primary tumor.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI can detect cancer in the contralateral breast that is missed by mammography and clinical examination at the time of the initial breast-cancer diagnosis. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00058058 [ClinicalTrials.gov].). Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17392300     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa065447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  196 in total

1.  Incremental value of magnetic resonance imaging for breast surgery planning.

Authors:  Sibel Ozkan Gurdal; Beyza Ozcinar; Munire Kayahan; Abdullah Igci; Mehtap Tunaci; Vahit Ozmen; Gulden Acunas; Ekrem Yavuz; Mustafa Kecer; Mahmut Muslumanoglu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Q and a: magnetic resonance imaging in the detection and evaluation of breast cancer.

Authors:  Dana S Wollins; Mark R Somerfield
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results.

Authors:  Clarisse Dromain; Fabienne Thibault; Serge Muller; Françoise Rimareix; Suzette Delaloge; Anne Tardivon; Corinne Balleyguier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Multi-modality morphological correlation of axillary lymph nodes.

Authors:  Lina Arbash Meinel; Hiroyuki Abe; Martin Bergtholdt; Jacob Ecanow; Robert Schmidt; Gillian Newstead
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Nonmalignant breast lesions: ADCs of benign and high-risk subtypes assessed as false-positive at dynamic enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Sana Parsian; Habib Rahbar; Kimberly H Allison; Wendy B Demartini; Matthew L Olson; Constance D Lehman; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Predictors of contralateral breast cancer in patients with unilateral breast cancer undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  Min Yi; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Lavinia P Middleton; Banu K Arun; Isabelle Bedrosian; Gildy V Babiera; Rosa F Hwang; Henry M Kuerer; Wei Yang; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  [Therapy monitoring of neoadjuvant therapy with MRI. RECIST and functional imaging].

Authors:  S Grandl; M Ingrisch; K Hellerhoff
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Estimation of tumor size in breast cancer comparing clinical examination, mammography, ultrasound and MRI-correlation with the pathological analysis of the surgical specimen.

Authors:  Tomas Cortadellas; Paula Argacha; Juan Acosta; Jordi Rabasa; Ricardo Peiró; Margarita Gomez; Laura Rodellar; Sandra Gomez; Alejandra Navarro-Golobart; Sonia Sanchez-Mendez; Milagros Martinez-Medina; Mireia Botey; Carlos Muñoz-Ramos; Manel Xiberta
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-08

Review 9.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions using magnetization transfer imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Samantha L Heller; Linda Moy; Sherlin Lavianlivi; Melanie Moccaldi; Sungheon Kim
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.