Literature DB >> 12933450

MRI of occult breast carcinoma in a high-risk population.

Elizabeth A Morris1, Laura Liberman, Douglas J Ballon, Mark Robson, Andrea F Abramson, Alexandra Heerdt, D David Dershaw.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of cancer and the positive predictive value of biopsy in the first screening round of breast MRI in women at high risk of developing breast cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of the records of 367 consecutive women at high risk of developing breast cancer who had normal findings on mammography and their first breast MRI screening examination during a 2-year period. The frequency of recommending biopsy at the first screening MRI study and the biopsy results were reviewed.
RESULTS: Biopsy was recommended in 64 women (17%). Biopsy revealed cancer that was occult on mammography and physical examination in 14 (24%) of 59 women who had biopsy and in 14 (4%) of 367 women who underwent breast MRI screening. Histologic findings in 14 women with cancer were ductal carcinoma in situ in eight (57%) and infiltrating carcinoma in six (43%). The median size of infiltrating carcinoma was 0.4 cm (range, 0.1-1.2 cm). Two patients had nodes that were positive for cancer. Biopsy revealed high-risk lesions (atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ, or radial scar) in 13 (4%) of 367 women and other benign findings in 32 (9%) of 367 women who had MRI screening.
CONCLUSION: Among women at high risk of developing breast cancer, breast MRI led to a recommendation of biopsy in 17%. Cancer was found in 24% of women who underwent biopsy and in 4% of women who had breast MRI screening. More than half the MRI-detected cancers were ductal carcinoma in situ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12933450     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.181.3.1810619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  61 in total

1.  Utility of second-look ultrasound in the management of incidental enhancing lesions detected by breast MR imaging.

Authors:  G Carbognin; V Girardi; C Calciolari; A Brandalise; F Bonetti; A Russo; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in focal breast lesions: analysis of 78 cases with pathological correlation.

Authors:  F Fornasa; L Pinali; A Gasparini; E Toniolli; S Montemezzi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Detection of non-palpable breast cancer in asymptomatic women by using unenhanced diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted MR imaging: comparison with mammography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Hidetake Yabuuchi; Yoshio Matsuo; Shunya Sunami; Takeshi Kamitani; Satoshi Kawanami; Taro Setoguchi; Shuji Sakai; Masamitsu Hatakenaka; Makoto Kubo; Eriko Tokunaga; Hidetaka Yamamoto; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Factors affecting the decision of breast cancer patients to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  Min Yi; Kelly K Hunt; Banu K Arun; Isabelle Bedrosian; Angelica Gutierrez Barrera; Kim-Anh Do; Henry M Kuerer; Gildy V Babiera; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Kaylene Ready; Jennifer Litton; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-07-20

5.  Value of pre-operative breast MRI for the size assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Francesca Proulx; José A Correa; Romuald Ferré; Atilla Omeroglu; Ann Aldis; Sarkis Meterissian; Benoît Mesurolle
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Advances in breast imaging: magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Lia Bartella; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy with a handheld biopsy system: clinical experience and results in postinterventional MR mammography after 24 h.

Authors:  E A Hauth; H J Jaeger; J Lubnau; S Maderwald; F Otterbach; R Kimmig; M Forsting
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Katrina Armstrong; Constance D Lehman; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Maxine S Jochelson; D David Dershaw; Janice S Sung; Alexandra S Heerdt; Cynthia Thornton; Chaya S Moskowitz; Jessica Ferrara; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.