Literature DB >> 27898602

Novel High Spatiotemporal Resolution Versus Standard-of-Care Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: Comparison of Image Quality.

Courtney K Morrison1, Leah C Henze Bancroft, Wendy B DeMartini, James H Holmes, Kang Wang, Ryan J Bosca, Frank R Korosec, Roberta M Strigel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Currently, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prioritizes spatial resolution over temporal resolution given the limitations of acquisition techniques. The purpose of our intrapatient study was to assess the ability of a novel high spatial and high temporal resolution DCE breast MRI method to maintain image quality compared with the clinical standard-of-care (SOC) MRI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients, each demonstrating a focal area of enhancement (29 benign, 1 cancer) on their SOC MRI, consented to undergo a research DCE breast MRI on a second date. For the research DCE MRI, a method (DIfferential Subsampling with Cartesian Ordering [DISCO]) using pseudorandom k-space sampling, view sharing reconstruction, 2-point Dixon fat-water separation, and parallel imaging was used to produce images with an effective temporal resolution 6 times faster than the SOC MRI (27 vs 168 seconds, respectively). Both the SOC and DISCO MRI scans were acquired with matching spatial resolutions of 0.8 × 0.8 × 1.6 mm. Image quality (distortion/artifacts, resolution, fat suppression, lesion conspicuity, perceived signal-to-noise ratio, and overall image quality) was scored by 3 radiologists in a blinded reader study.
RESULTS: Differences in image quality scores between the DISCO and SOC images were all less than 0.8 on a 10-point scale, and both methods were assessed as providing diagnostic image quality in all cases. DISCO images with the same high spatial resolution, but 6 times the effective temporal resolution as the SOC MRI scans, were produced, yielding 20 postcontrast time points with DISCO compared with 3 for the SOC MRI, over the same total time interval.
CONCLUSIONS: DISCO provided comparable image quality compared with the SOC MRI, while also providing 6 times faster effective temporal resolution and the same high spatial resolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27898602      PMCID: PMC5339074          DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  40 in total

1.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA).

Authors:  Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  A feasible high spatiotemporal resolution breast DCE-MRI protocol for clinical settings.

Authors:  Luminita A Tudorica; Karen Y Oh; Nicole Roy; Mark D Kettler; Yiyi Chen; Stephanie L Hemmingson; Aneela Afzal; John W Grinstead; Gerhard Laub; Xin Li; Wei Huang
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Hans H Schild; Nuschin Morakkabati
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  SENSE imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Paul D Friedman; Srirama V Swaminathan; Robert Smith
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Breast MRI in community practice: equipment and imaging techniques at facilities in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Authors:  Wendy B DeMartini; Laura Ichikawa; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Diana Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Berta Geller; Tracy Onega; Robert D Rosenberg; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Use of breast MRI surveillance in women at high risk for breast cancer: a single-institutional experience.

Authors:  Leisha Elmore; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease.

Authors:  E Henderson; B K Rutt; T Y Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  A novel approach to contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging for screening: high-resolution ultrafast dynamic imaging.

Authors:  Ritse M Mann; Roel D Mus; Jan van Zelst; Christian Geppert; Nico Karssemeijer; Bram Platel
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Wendy B DeMartini; Laura Ichikawa; Constance D Lehman; Tracy Onega; Karla Kerlikowske; Louise M Henderson; Berta M Geller; Mike Hofmann; Bonnie C Yankaskas
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 21.873

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comprehensive Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast With Fat/Water Separation and High Spatiotemporal Resolution Using Radial Sampling, Compressed Sensing, and Parallel Imaging.

Authors:  Thomas Benkert; Kai Tobias Block; Samantha Heller; Melanie Moccaldi; Daniel K Sodickson; Sungheon Gene Kim; Linda Moy
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Contrast-free MRI quantitative parameters for early prediction of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Siyao Du; Si Gao; Ruimeng Zhao; Hongbo Liu; Yan Wang; Xixun Qi; Shu Li; Jibin Cao; Lina Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 7.034

3.  Delta-Radiomics Based on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Predicts Pathologic Complete Response in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Liangcun Guo; Siyao Du; Si Gao; Ruimeng Zhao; Guoliang Huang; Feng Jin; Yuee Teng; Lina Zhang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Differential Subsampling with Cartesian Ordering Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography for the Preoperative Assessment of Anterolateral Thigh Flap.

Authors:  Yunfeng Shen; Xiucun Li; Chao Zhang; Hai Zhong; Weiqiang Dou
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 7.109

5.  Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC).

Authors:  Carlos Canelo-Aybar; Alvaro Taype-Rondan; Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka; David Rigau; Axel Graewingholt; Annette Lebeau; Elsa Pérez Gómez; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Miranda Langendam; Margarita Posso; Elena Parmelli; Zuleika Saz-Parkinson; Pablo Alonso-Coello
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Quantitative imaging biomarkers alliance (QIBA) recommendations for improved precision of DWI and DCE-MRI derived biomarkers in multicenter oncology trials.

Authors:  Amita Shukla-Dave; Nancy A Obuchowski; Thomas L Chenevert; Sachin Jambawalikar; Lawrence H Schwartz; Dariya Malyarenko; Wei Huang; Susan M Noworolski; Robert J Young; Mark S Shiroishi; Harrison Kim; Catherine Coolens; Hendrik Laue; Caroline Chung; Mark Rosen; Michael Boss; Edward F Jackson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.119

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.