Literature DB >> 7784554

Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy.

S G Orel1, M D Schnall, C M Powell, M G Hochman, L J Solin, B L Fowble, M H Torosian, E F Rosato.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on staging of breast cancer in patients with mammographically or clinically suspected tumor.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-six patients underwent breast MR imaging at 1.5 T before excisional biopsy of a suspicious mammographic or palpable abnormality. Diagnostic imaging studies in patients with biopsy-proved or presumed breast carcinoma were reviewed.
RESULTS: Sixty-four patients met the study criteria. MR imaging enabled detection of all 57 invasive breast cancers and nine of 15 in situ cancers. In 22 patients (34%), MR imaging depicted one or more cancers not visible at mammography, 13 (20%) of which were unsuspected multifocal or diffuse disease. As a result of the increased sensitivity of MR imaging compared with that of mammography, clinical staging and subsequent treatment were altered in seven patients (11%).
CONCLUSION: MR imaging allows detection of mammographically and clinically occult foci of carcinoma in patients with suspected breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7784554     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.196.1.7784554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  39 in total

1.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results.

Authors:  Clarisse Dromain; Fabienne Thibault; Serge Muller; Françoise Rimareix; Suzette Delaloge; Anne Tardivon; Corinne Balleyguier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Low-field versus high-field MRI in diagnosing breast disorders.

Authors:  Eija Pääkkö; Heli Reinikainen; Eija-Leena Lindholm; Tarja Rissanen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Cluster analysis of signal-intensity time course in dynamic breast MRI: does unsupervised vector quantization help to evaluate small mammographic lesions?

Authors:  Gerda Leinsinger; Thomas Schlossbauer; Michael Scherr; Oliver Lange; Maximilian Reiser; Axel Wismüller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  MR-guided breast biopsy and hook wire marking using a low-field (0.23 T) scanner with optical instrument tracking.

Authors:  Roberto Blanco Sequeiros; Heli Reinikainen; Andreas M Blanco Sequeiros; Teuvo Vaara; Risto Ojala; Eija Pääkkö; Osmo Tervonen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Classification of small contrast enhancing breast lesions in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging using a combination of morphological criteria and dynamic analysis based on unsupervised vector-quantization.

Authors:  Thomas Schlossbauer; Gerda Leinsinger; Axel Wismuller; Oliver Lange; Michael Scherr; Anke Meyer-Baese; Maximilian Reiser
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 6.  Advances in breast imaging: magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Lia Bartella; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 7.  Technical aspects of breast MRI--do they affect outcomes?

Authors:  Ruth Warren; Stefano Ciatto; Petra Macaskill; Richard Black; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  MR imaging-guided 10-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: histological characterisation.

Authors:  T Perretta; C A Pistolese; F Bolacchi; E Cossu; V Fiaschetti; G Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-07-05       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Gd-labeled glycol chitosan as a pH-responsive magnetic resonance imaging agent for detecting acidic tumor microenvironments.

Authors:  Kido Nwe; Ching-Hui Huang; Andrew Tsourkas
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  The influence of preoperative MRI of the breasts on recurrence rate in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Uwe Fischer; Olivier Zachariae; Friedemann Baum; Dorit von Heyden; Matthias Funke; Torsten Liersch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.