Literature DB >> 21029889

Construct validity of a surgical simulator as a valid model for capsulorhexis training.

Brian Privett1, Emily Greenlee, Gina Rogers, Thomas A Oetting.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the performance on the EYESi surgical simulator capsulorhexis training module between medical students and residents and experienced cataract surgeons.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
DESIGN: Comparative case series.
METHODS: The study comprised medical students and residents at the University of Iowa and experienced cataract surgeons. Neither group had experience with the simulator. Each participant completed 4 trials on the capsulorhexis module.
RESULTS: The 7 experienced surgeons achieved statistically significantly better total scores than the 16 medical students and residents on the easy level and the medium level of the capsulorhexis module (P = .004 and P = .000007, respectively). Experienced surgeons achieved significantly better scores in all parameters at the medium level, with better centering (P = .001), less corneal injury (P = .02), fewer spikes (P = .03), less time operating without a red reflex (P = .0005), better roundness of the capsulorhexis (P = .003), and less time completing tasks (P = .008).
CONCLUSION: The surgical simulator capsulorhexis module showed significant construct validity (P<.05). Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21029889     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  20 in total

1.  Rabbit models for continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis instruction.

Authors:  Jason Ruggiero; Christopher Keller; Travis Porco; Ayman Naseri; David W Sretavan
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Simulation in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Billi S Wallace; Nelson R Sabates
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr

3.  [Undergraduate teaching in ophthalmology. Do standardized practical examinations make sense?].

Authors:  A Simmenroth-Nayda; Y Görlich; M Wagner; M Müther; C Lohse; L Utte; S Leiterholt; H Hoerauf; N Feltgen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  The development of a virtual reality training programme for ophthalmology: repeatability and reproducibility (part of the International Forum for Ophthalmic Simulation Studies).

Authors:  G M Saleh; K Theodoraki; S Gillan; P Sullivan; F O'Sullivan; B Hussain; C Bunce; I Athanasiadis
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Development of a virtual reality training curriculum for phacoemulsification surgery.

Authors:  A V Spiteri; R Aggarwal; T L Kersey; M Sira; L Benjamin; A W Darzi; P A Bloom
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Virtual reality phacoemulsification training.

Authors:  R Pokroy; E Du; A Alzaga; S Khodadadeh; D Steen; B Bachynski; P Edwards
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Impact of simulator training on resident cataract surgery.

Authors:  Russell Pokroy; Elizabeth Du; Ana Alzaga; Sarah Khodadadeh; Daniel Steen; Brian Bachynski; Paul Edwards
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  The Eyesi simulator in training ophthalmology residents: results of a pilot study on self-efficacy, motivation and performance.

Authors:  Robert Pl Wisse; Tessa Coster; Marieke Van der Schaaf; Olle Ten Cate
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2017-07-06

9.  Continuous Curvilinear Capsulorhexis Training and Non-Rhexis Related Vitreous Loss: The Specificity of Virtual Reality Simulator Surgical Training (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).

Authors:  Colin A McCannel
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2017-08-22

10.  Surgical Simulation Training Reduces Intraoperative Cataract Surgery Complications Among Residents.

Authors:  Patrick C Staropoli; Ninel Z Gregori; Anna K Junk; Anat Galor; Raquel Goldhardt; Brian E Goldhagen; Wei Shi; William Feuer
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.929

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.