BACKGROUND: Virtual reality surgery simulation training improves resident performance as measured by the simulator itself and wet-lab performance. This study aims to determine whether virtual surgery simulator training improves actual resident cataract surgery performance. METHODS: The first 50 phacoemulsification cases of 20 residents, at a single residency program (Henry Ford Hospital), were retrospectively compared as two groups: before (2007-8) and after (2009-10) introduction of the Eyesi virtual surgery simulator to the surgical training program. Primary outcomes were the incidence of posterior capsule tears and operation duration. All residents received traditional didactic and wet-lab training. Instructor surgeons were surveyed for their impression of the simulator's contribution to resident surgical training. RESULTS: The nonsimulator and simulator groups each comprised 500 cases with 40 and 35 posterior capsule tears respectively. Capsular tear rates for the nonsimulator and simulator groups were 8.8 % and 10 % respectively for the first 25 cases, and 7.2 % and 3.6 % (P = 0.11) respectively for cases 26 through 50 . The percentage of long cases (defined as >40 min) for cases 10 through 50 was 42.3 % and 32.4 % (P = 0.005) for the nonsimulator and simulator groups respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual reality surgical simulator training mildly shortens the learning curve for the first 50 phacoemulsification cases. The less adept residents appear to benefit most.
BACKGROUND: Virtual reality surgery simulation training improves resident performance as measured by the simulator itself and wet-lab performance. This study aims to determine whether virtual surgery simulator training improves actual resident cataract surgery performance. METHODS: The first 50 phacoemulsification cases of 20 residents, at a single residency program (Henry Ford Hospital), were retrospectively compared as two groups: before (2007-8) and after (2009-10) introduction of the Eyesi virtual surgery simulator to the surgical training program. Primary outcomes were the incidence of posterior capsule tears and operation duration. All residents received traditional didactic and wet-lab training. Instructor surgeons were surveyed for their impression of the simulator's contribution to resident surgical training. RESULTS: The nonsimulator and simulator groups each comprised 500 cases with 40 and 35 posterior capsule tears respectively. Capsular tear rates for the nonsimulator and simulator groups were 8.8 % and 10 % respectively for the first 25 cases, and 7.2 % and 3.6 % (P = 0.11) respectively for cases 26 through 50 . The percentage of long cases (defined as >40 min) for cases 10 through 50 was 42.3 % and 32.4 % (P = 0.005) for the nonsimulator and simulator groups respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual reality surgical simulator training mildly shortens the learning curve for the first 50 phacoemulsification cases. The less adept residents appear to benefit most.
Authors: Daniel G Ezra; Raj Aggarwal; Michel Michaelides; Narciss Okhravi; Seema Verma; Larry Benjamin; Philip Bloom; Ara Darzi; Paul Sullivan Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2008-12-16 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Gina M Rogers; Thomas A Oetting; Andrew G Lee; Connie Grignon; Emily Greenlee; A Tim Johnson; Hilary A Beaver; Keith Carter Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 3.351
Authors: J Bradley Randleman; Jeremy D Wolfe; Maria Woodward; Michael J Lynn; D Hunter Cherwek; Sunil K Srivastava Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2007-09
Authors: Daniel Shu Wei Ting; Shaun Sebastian Khung Peng Sim; Christine Wen Leng Yau; Mohamad Rosman; Ai Tee Aw; Ian Yew San Yeo Journal: Int J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-06-18 Impact factor: 1.779
Authors: Khalil M Al-Salem; Fawwaz A Al-Sarayra; Mohammad Abu Al-Dabaat; Wisam Shihadeh; Mohammad M Al-Salem; Mahmoud K Al-Salem; Shlomit Schaal Journal: Int J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-10-18 Impact factor: 1.779
Authors: Eileen L Mayro; Laura T Pizzi; Lisa A Hark; Ann P Murchison; Douglas Wisner; Anish Koka; Benjamin E Leiby; Nooreen Dabbish; Adedoyin Okulate; Alexa Dessy; Caitlin Green; Robert Bailey Journal: Am Health Drug Benefits Date: 2018-12
Authors: Erika M Ellis; Jeffrey E Lee; Luke Saunders; Weldon W Haw; David B Granet; Chris W Heichel Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 3.351
Authors: Patrick C Staropoli; Ninel Z Gregori; Anna K Junk; Anat Galor; Raquel Goldhardt; Brian E Goldhagen; Wei Shi; William Feuer Journal: Simul Healthc Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 1.929