INTRODUCTION: This retrospective consecutive case series examined whether training on a surgical simulator reduces intraoperative complication rates among novice ophthalmology residents learning cataract surgery. METHODS: Beginning July 2014, training on the Eyesi simulator became mandatory for novice postgraduate year 3 ophthalmology residents before live cataract surgery at our institution. Complication rates of the 11 simulator-trained residents (study group) were compared with their immediate 11 simulator-naive predecessors (comparison group). Only straightforward cataract cases (according to standardized preoperative criteria) where postgraduate year 3 residents served as the primary surgeon were included. Complication data were obtained from Morbidity and Mortality records and compared using Fisher exact test. A survey was administered to the residents to gauge the perceived utility of simulation training. RESULTS: The simulator-trained group (n = 501 cataract cases) and the simulator-naive comparison group (n = 454 cases) were analyzed. The complication rate in the simulator group was 2.4% compared with 5.1% in the comparison group (P = 0.037, Fisher exact test). Both the mean posterior capsule tear rate and vitreous prolapse rate in the simulator group were 2.2% compared with 4.8% in the comparison group (P = 0.032, Fisher exact test). The survey had a response rate of 100% (11/11), and 91% (10/11) of respondents felt that the training was "extremely worthwhile" and should be mandatory. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of surgical simulation training was associated with a significantly reduced rate of complications, including posterior capsule tears and vitreous prolapse, among novice postgraduate year 3 residents. There is a perceived utility among residents to incorporate virtual simulation into surgical training.
INTRODUCTION: This retrospective consecutive case series examined whether training on a surgical simulator reduces intraoperative complication rates among novice ophthalmology residents learning cataract surgery. METHODS: Beginning July 2014, training on the Eyesi simulator became mandatory for novice postgraduate year 3 ophthalmology residents before live cataract surgery at our institution. Complication rates of the 11 simulator-trained residents (study group) were compared with their immediate 11 simulator-naive predecessors (comparison group). Only straightforward cataract cases (according to standardized preoperative criteria) where postgraduate year 3 residents served as the primary surgeon were included. Complication data were obtained from Morbidity and Mortality records and compared using Fisher exact test. A survey was administered to the residents to gauge the perceived utility of simulation training. RESULTS: The simulator-trained group (n = 501 cataract cases) and the simulator-naive comparison group (n = 454 cases) were analyzed. The complication rate in the simulator group was 2.4% compared with 5.1% in the comparison group (P = 0.037, Fisher exact test). Both the mean posterior capsule tear rate and vitreous prolapse rate in the simulator group were 2.2% compared with 4.8% in the comparison group (P = 0.032, Fisher exact test). The survey had a response rate of 100% (11/11), and 91% (10/11) of respondents felt that the training was "extremely worthwhile" and should be mandatory. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of surgical simulation training was associated with a significantly reduced rate of complications, including posterior capsule tears and vitreous prolapse, among novice postgraduate year 3 residents. There is a perceived utility among residents to incorporate virtual simulation into surgical training.
Authors: Paul B Greenberg; Victoria L Tseng; Wen-Chih Wu; Jeffrey Liu; Lan Jiang; Christine K Chen; Ingrid U Scott; Peter D Friedmann Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2010-10-29 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ann Sofia Skou Thomsen; Jens Folke Kiilgaard; Hadi Kjaerbo; Morten la Cour; Lars Konge Journal: Acta Ophthalmol Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 3.761
Authors: K T Boden; A Rickmann; F N Fries; K Xanthopoulou; D Alnaggar; K Januschowski; B Seitz; B Käsmann-Kellner; J Schrecker Journal: Ophthalmologe Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 1.059
Authors: Henry D Greyner-Almeida; Ali Mahdavi Fard; Chi Chen; Jiwei Zhao; Sangita P Patel Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2022-01-29 Impact factor: 2.029
Authors: Ninel Z Gregori; Marianeli Rodriguez; Patrick C Staropoli; Sapir Z Karli; Anat Galor; Sarah R Wellik; Raquel Goldhardt; Wei Shi; Anna K Junk Journal: Can J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-08-24 Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: Mads Forslund Jacobsen; Lars Konge; Morten la Cour; Lars Holm; Hadi Kjaerbo; Birgitte Moldow; George M Saleh; Ann Sofia Skou Thomsen Journal: Acta Ophthalmol Date: 2020-04-18 Impact factor: 3.761
Authors: Lukas P Mileder; Gerhilde Schüttengruber; Jürgen Prattes; Thomas Wegscheider Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2020-07-17 Impact factor: 1.817