Literature DB >> 29021716

Continuous Curvilinear Capsulorhexis Training and Non-Rhexis Related Vitreous Loss: The Specificity of Virtual Reality Simulator Surgical Training (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).

Colin A McCannel1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the specificity of simulation-based virtual reality ophthalmic cataract surgery training on the Eyesi ophthalmic virtual reality surgical simulator, and test the hypothesis that microsurgical motor learning is highly specific.
METHODS: Retrospective educational interventional case series. The rates of vitreous loss and retained lens material, and vitreous loss and retained lens material associated with an errant continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) were assessed among 1037 consecutive cataract surgeries performed during four consecutive academic years at a teaching hospital. The data were grouped by Eyesi use and capsulorhexis intensive training curriculum (CITC) completion. The main intervention was the completion of the CITC on the Eyesi.
RESULTS: In the Eyesi simulator experience-based stratification, the vitreous loss rate was similar in each group (chi square p=0.95) and was not preceded by an errant CCC in 86.2% for "CITC done at least once", 57.1% for "CITC not done, but some Eyesi use", and 48.9% for "none" training groups (p=4×10-5). Retained lens material overall and occurring among the errant CCC cases was similar among training groups (p=0.82 and p=0.71, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Eyesi capsulorhexis training was not associated with lower vitreous loss rates overall. However, non-errant CCC associated vitreous loss was higher among those who underwent Eyesi capsulorhexis training. Training focused on the CCC portion of cataract surgery may not reduce vitreous loss unassociated with an errant CCC. It is likely that surgical training is highly specific to the task being trained. Residents may need to be trained for all surgical steps with adequate intensity to minimize overall complication rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29021716      PMCID: PMC5598788     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc        ISSN: 0065-9533


  33 in total

1.  Subjective difficulty of each stage of phacoemulsification cataract surgery performed by basic surgical trainees.

Authors:  Ian J Dooley; Paul D O'Brien
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Especial skills: specificity embedded within generality.

Authors:  Katherine M Keetch; Timothy D Lee; Richard A Schmidt
Journal:  J Sport Exerc Psychol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.016

3.  Virtual reality cataract surgery training: learning curves and concurrent validity.

Authors:  Madeleine Selvander; Peter Åsman
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.761

4.  Risk factors for vitreous complications in resident-performed phacoemulsification surgery.

Authors:  Preston H Blomquist; Marlene E Morales; Liyue Tong; Chul Ahn
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Resident phacoemulsification experience using the in situ nuclear fracture technique.

Authors:  R J Noecker; R W Allinson; R W Snyder
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1994-04

6.  Specificity of arm training on aerobic power during swimming and running.

Authors:  T J Gergley; W D McArdle; P DeJesus; M M Toner; S Jacobowitz; R J Spina
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Ophthalmic surgery simulator training improves resident performance of capsulorhexis in the operating room.

Authors:  Colin A McCannel; David C Reed; Darin R Goldman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Visual outcomes and incidence of vitreous loss for residents performing phacoemulsification without prior planned extracapsular cataract extraction experience.

Authors:  David A Quillen; Stephen J Phipps
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Construct validity of anterior segment anti-tremor and forceps surgical simulator training modules: attending versus resident surgeon performance.

Authors:  Michael A Mahr; David O Hodge
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Computer-assisted training system for pars plana vitrectomy.

Authors:  Jost B Jonas; Stefan Rabethge; Hans-Joachim Bender
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2003-12
View more
  7 in total

1.  Quantifying the real-world cost saving from using surgical adjuncts to prevent complications during cataract surgery.

Authors:  Aaron Jamison; Larry Benjamin; David Lockington
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  A portable, low-cost practice model for microsurgical skills training.

Authors:  Henry D Greyner-Almeida; Ali Mahdavi Fard; Chi Chen; Jiwei Zhao; Sangita P Patel
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 2.029

Review 3.  Simulators in the training of surgeons: is it worth the investment in money and time? 2018 Jules Gonin lecture of the Retina Research Foundation.

Authors:  Morten la Cour; Ann Sofia Skou Thomsen; Mark Alberti; Lars Konge
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Commentary: High fidelity and cost-effective cataract surgery training system: Need of the hour.

Authors:  Bruttendu Moharana; Priti Singh; Smita Patel; Purva Srivastava; Bhavana Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 5.  Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Ophthalmology: A Contemporary Prospective.

Authors:  Mina Iskander; Titilola Ogunsola; Rithambara Ramachandran; Richard McGowan; Lama A Al-Aswad
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2021 May-Jun 01

6.  Effectiveness of simulation-based training for manual small incision cataract surgery among novice surgeons: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Akshay Gopinathan Nair; Chetan Ahiwalay; Ashish E Bacchav; Tejas Sheth; Van Charles Lansingh; S Swaroop Vedula; Venudhar Bhatt; Jagadesh C Reddy; Pravin K Vadavalli; Smita Praveen; Nikhilesh Anil Wairagade; Jeff Pettey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  A systematic review of simulation-based training tools for technical and non-technical skills in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Roxanne Lee; Nicholas Raison; Wai Yan Lau; Abdullatif Aydin; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed; Shreya Haldar
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.775

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.