Literature DB >> 23970027

The development of a virtual reality training programme for ophthalmology: repeatability and reproducibility (part of the International Forum for Ophthalmic Simulation Studies).

G M Saleh1, K Theodoraki, S Gillan, P Sullivan, F O'Sullivan, B Hussain, C Bunce, I Athanasiadis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the variability of performance among novice ophthalmic trainees in a range of repeated tasks using the Eyesi virtual reality (VR) simulator.
METHODS: Eighteen subjects undertook three attempts of five cataract specific and generic three-dimensional tasks: continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis, cracking and chopping, cataract navigation, bimanual cataract training, anti-tremor. Scores for each attempt were out of a maximum of 100 points. A non-parametric test was used to analyse the data, where a P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Highly significant differences were found between the scores achieved in the first attempt and that during the second (P<0.0001) and third (P<0.0001) but not between the second and third attempt (P=0.65). There was no significant variability in the overall score between the users (P=0.1104) or in the difference between their highest and lowest score (P=0.3878). Highly significant differences between tasks were shown both in the overall score (P=0.0001) and in the difference between highest and lowest score (P=0.003).
CONCLUSION: This study, which is the first to quantify reproducibility of performance in entry level trainees using a VR tool, demonstrated significant intra-novice variability. The cohort of subjects performed equally overall in the range of tasks (no inter-novice variability) but each showed that performance varies significantly with the complexity of the task when using this high-fidelity instrument.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23970027      PMCID: PMC3831124          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2013.166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  14 in total

1.  Virtual reality simulation training can improve inexperienced surgeons' endovascular skills.

Authors:  R Aggarwal; S A Black; J R Hance; A Darzi; N J W Cheshire
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 7.069

2.  Evaluating surgical dexterity during corneal suturing.

Authors:  George M Saleh; George Voyatzis; Yiorgos Voyazis; Julian Hance; Joel Ratnasothy; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-09

3.  Virtual reality simulation in acquiring and differentiating basic ophthalmic microsurgical skills.

Authors:  Daniel J Solverson; Robert A Mazzoli; William R Raymond; Mark L Nelson; Elizabeth A Hansen; Mark F Torres; Anuja Bhandari; Craig D Hartranft
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.929

4.  Kinematic analysis of surgical dexterity in intraocular surgery.

Authors:  George M Saleh; Dan Lindfield; Dawn Sim; Elena Tsesmetzoglou; Vinod Gauba; David S Gartry; Salim Ghoussayni
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-06

Review 5.  Phacoemulsification skills training and assessment.

Authors:  Anthony Spiteri; Rajesh Aggarwal; Tom Kersey; Larry Benjamin; Ara Darzi; Philip Bloom
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Construct validity of a surgical simulator as a valid model for capsulorhexis training.

Authors:  Brian Privett; Emily Greenlee; Gina Rogers; Thomas A Oetting
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 7.  Virtual reality simulator training of laparoscopic cholecystectomies - a systematic review.

Authors:  T S Ikonen; T Antikainen; M Silvennoinen; J Isojärvi; E Mäkinen; T M Scheinin
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.360

8.  Objective structured assessment of cataract surgical skill.

Authors:  George M Saleh; Vinod Gauba; Arijit Mitra; Andre S Litwin; Andrew K K Chung; Larry Benjamin
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-03

9.  Cataract surgeons outperform medical students in Eyesi virtual reality cataract surgery: evidence for construct validity.

Authors:  Madeleine Selvander; Peter Asman
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.761

10.  Construct validity of anterior segment anti-tremor and forceps surgical simulator training modules: attending versus resident surgeon performance.

Authors:  Michael A Mahr; David O Hodge
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.351

View more
  8 in total

1.  Association of Weight-Adjusted Caffeine and β-Blocker Use With Ophthalmology Fellow Performance During Simulated Vitreoretinal Microsurgery.

Authors:  Marina Roizenblatt; Vitor Dias Gomes Barrios Marin; Alex Treiger Grupenmacher; Felipe Muralha; Jean Faber; Kim Jiramongkolchai; Peter Louis Gehlbach; Michel Eid Farah; Rubens Belfort; Mauricio Maia
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Response to Swampillai et al.

Authors:  G M Saleh; K Theodoraki; S Gillan; P Sullivan; F O'Sullivan; B Hussain; C Bunce; I Athanasiadis
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  The development of a virtual reality training programme for ophthalmology: study must take into account visual acuity and stereopsis.

Authors:  A J Swampillai; S Waqar; J C Park; N Modi; T L Kersey; T J Sleep
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 4.  Ophthalmology simulation for undergraduate and postgraduate clinical education.

Authors:  Daniel Shu Wei Ting; Shaun Sebastian Khung Peng Sim; Christine Wen Leng Yau; Mohamad Rosman; Ai Tee Aw; Ian Yew San Yeo
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 5.  Modern Educational Simulation-Based Tools Among Residents of Ophthalmology: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Simon J Lowater; Jakob Grauslund; Anna S Vergmann
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-08-24

6.  The use of a virtual reality surgical simulator for cataract surgical skill assessment with 6 months of intervening operating room experience.

Authors:  Shameema Sikder; Jia Luo; P Pat Banerjee; Cristian Luciano; Patrick Kania; Jonathan C Song; Eman S Kahtani; Deepak P Edward; Abdul-Elah Al Towerki
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-20

7.  Impact of virtual reality simulation on learning barriers of phacoemulsification perceived by residents.

Authors:  Danny Siu-Chun Ng; Zihan Sun; Alvin Lerrmann Young; Simon Tak-Chuen Ko; Jerry Ka-Hing Lok; Timothy Yuk-Yau Lai; Shameema Sikder; Clement C Tham
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-11

Review 8.  A systematic review of simulation-based training tools for technical and non-technical skills in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Roxanne Lee; Nicholas Raison; Wai Yan Lau; Abdullatif Aydin; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed; Shreya Haldar
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.775

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.