Literature DB >> 23712519

[Undergraduate teaching in ophthalmology. Do standardized practical examinations make sense?].

A Simmenroth-Nayda1, Y Görlich, M Wagner, M Müther, C Lohse, L Utte, S Leiterholt, H Hoerauf, N Feltgen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: University teaching in ophthalmology has tended to focus on imparting knowledge rather than practical skills. The new skills laboratory at the University Medical Center in Göttingen enables practical skills to be taught. The focus is on basic skills that could help all physicians. The learning goals set are techniques considered basic in ophthalmology that can be mastered without requiring any physician to operate major equipment.
METHODS: The design and results from four semesters of an ophthalmological objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) following students engaged in peer-teaching, as well as feedback from a student questionnaire are described.
RESULTS: Practical skills can successfully be taught and mastered within 1 week and 68-100 % of all students achieved the maximum scores in the individual tests. The OSCE and peer- eaching were well received by the students.
CONCLUSIONS: Practical skills and peer teaching fulfill student educational goals in ophthalmology and are well accepted by undergraduates.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23712519     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-013-2859-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  15 in total

1.  OSCE: the Dundee experience.

Authors:  Margery H Davis
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 2.  Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains.

Authors:  K Anders Ericsson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Assessment steers learning down the right road: impact of progress testing on licensing examination performance.

Authors:  Geoff Norman; Alan Neville; Jennifer M Blake; Barber Mueller
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.650

4.  Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination.

Authors:  R M Harden; M Stevenson; W W Downie; G M Wilson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-02-22

Review 5.  A systematic review of peer teaching and learning in clinical education.

Authors:  Jacinta Secomb
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 3.036

6.  Introducing progress testing in McMaster University's problem-based medical curriculum: psychometric properties and effect on learning.

Authors:  J M Blake; G R Norman; D R Keane; C B Mueller; J Cunnington; N Didyk
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Peer learning in clinical education.

Authors:  M A Lincoln; L L McAllister
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.650

8.  Virtual reality training improves wet-lab performance of capsulorhexis: results of a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Elisabeth M Feudner; Corinna Engel; Irmingard M Neuhann; Katrin Petermeier; Karl-Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Peter Szurman
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Construct validity of anterior segment anti-tremor and forceps surgical simulator training modules: attending versus resident surgeon performance.

Authors:  Michael A Mahr; David O Hodge
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  How high are the personnel costs for OSCE? A financial report on management aspects.

Authors:  Thea Rau; Jörg Fegert; Hubert Liebhardt
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2011-02-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  [Ophthalmological student teaching-results of a survey at German universities].

Authors:  Nicolas Feltgen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.059

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.