Literature DB >> 22559372

Further evidence that fundamental-frequency difference limens measure pitch discrimination.

Christophe Micheyl1, Claire M Ryan, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

Difference limens for complex tones (DLCs) that differ in F0 are widely regarded as a measure of periodicity-pitch discrimination. However, because F0 changes are inevitably accompanied by changes in the frequencies of the harmonics, DLCs may actually reflect the discriminability of individual components. To test this hypothesis, DLCs were measured for complex tones, the component frequencies of which were shifted coherently upward or downward by ΔF = 0%, 25%, 37.5%, or 50% of the F0, yielding fully harmonic (ΔF = 0%), strongly inharmonic (ΔF = 25%, 37.5%), or odd-harmonic (ΔF = 50%) tones. If DLCs truly reflect periodicity-pitch discriminability, they should be larger (worse) for inharmonic tones than for harmonic and odd harmonic tones because inharmonic tones have a weaker pitch. Consistent with this prediction, the results of two experiments showed a non-monotonic dependence of DLCs on ΔF, with larger DLCs for ΔF's of ± 25% or ± 37.5% than for ΔF's of 0 or ± 50% of F0. These findings are consistent with models of pitch perception that involve harmonic templates or with an autocorrelation-based model provided that more than just the highest peak in the summary autocorrelogram is taken into account.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22559372      PMCID: PMC3356318          DOI: 10.1121/1.3699253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  51 in total

1.  Separate mechanisms govern the selection of spectral components for perceptual fusion and for the computation of global pitch.

Authors:  J M Brunstrom; B Roberts
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Responses to amplitude-modulated tones in the auditory nerve of the cat.

Authors:  P X Joris; T C Yin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Frequency discrimination of complex tones with overlapping and non-overlapping harmonics.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A computational model for rate-level functions from cat auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  M B Sachs; R L Winslow; B H Sokolowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Comment on "Algorithm for extraction of pitch and pitch salience from complex tonal signals" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71, 679-688 (1982)].

Authors:  J P Martens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A central spectrum model: a synthesis of auditory-nerve timing and place cues in monaural communication of frequency spectrum.

Authors:  P Srulovicz; J L Goldstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Evidence for a general template in central optimal processing for pitch of complex tones.

Authors:  A Gerson; J L Goldstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Pitch discrimination of harmonic complex signals: residue pitch or multiple component discriminations?

Authors:  A Faulkner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones.

Authors:  D H Johnson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  10 in total

1.  Infant pitch perception: Missing fundamental melody discrimination.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Kaylah Lalonde; Monika-Maria Oster; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Pitch strength of noise-vocoded harmonic tone complexes in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  William P Shofner; Jeannine Campbell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Superoptimal Perceptual Integration Suggests a Place-Based Representation of Pitch at High Frequencies.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Complex pitch perception mechanisms are shared by humans and a New World monkey.

Authors:  Xindong Song; Michael S Osmanski; Yueqi Guo; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Perception of missing fundamental pitch by 3- and 4-month-old human infants.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Infant Pitch and Timbre Discrimination in the Presence of Variation in the Other Dimension.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Andrew J Oxenham; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-09-14

7.  Perception of the pitch of unresolved harmonics by 3- and 7-month-old human infants.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Dual-pitch processing mechanisms in primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Daniel Bendor; Michael S Osmanski; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Diversity in pitch perception revealed by task dependence.

Authors:  Malinda J McPherson; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2017-12-11

10.  Harmonicity aids hearing in noise.

Authors:  Malinda J McPherson; River C Grace; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.157

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.