Literature DB >> 10738814

Level discrimination of sinusoids as a function of duration and level for fixed-level, roving-level, and across-frequency conditions.

A J Oxenham1, S Buus.   

Abstract

The ability of listeners to detect level differences between two sinusoidal stimuli in a two-interval forced-choice procedure was measured as a function of duration and level in three conditions: (1) the pedestal was fixed in level and the stimuli in the two intervals had the same frequency of either 1 or 2 kHz (fixed-level condition); (2) the pedestal was roved in level over a 20-dB range from trial to trial, but the stimuli still had the same frequency of either 1 or 2 kHz (roving-level condition); and (3) the pedestal was roved in level over a 20-dB range and the two stimuli differed in frequency, such that one was around 1 kHz while the other was around 2 kHz (across-frequency condition). In the fixed-level conditions, difference limens decreased (improved) with both increasing duration and level, as found in previous studies. In the roving-level conditions, difference limens increased and the dependence on duration and level decreased. Difference limens in the across-frequency conditions were generally highest and showed very little dependence on either stimulus duration or level. The results may be understood in terms of different internal noise components with additive variances: In the fixed-level conditions, sensation noise, which is dependent on stimulus attributes such as duration and level, is dominant. In more difficult conditions, where trace-memory and/or across-channel comparisons are required, a more central, stimulus-independent noise dominates.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10738814     DOI: 10.1121/1.428445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Joshua G W Bernstein; Hector Penagos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Does fundamental-frequency discrimination measure virtual pitch discrimination?

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Kristin Divis; David M Wrobleski; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spectral and temporal integration of brief tones.

Authors:  Evelyn M Hoglund; Lawrence L Feth
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  From comparison to classification: a cortical tool for boosting perception.

Authors:  Mor Nahum; Luba Daikhin; Yedida Lubin; Yamit Cohen; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Potential cues for the "level discrimination" of a noise band in the presence of flanking bands.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Analysis of spectral shape in the barn owl auditory system.

Authors:  U Langemann; M A Zokoll; G M Klump
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Effect of Pulse Rate on Loudness Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Mahan Azadpour; Colette M McKay; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-12

8.  On the choice of adequate randomization ranges for limiting the use of unwanted cues in same-different, dual-pair, and oddity tasks.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Separating the contributions of primary and unwanted cues in psychophysical studies.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 8.934

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.