Literature DB >> 20967437

Novel ultrasound method to reposition kidney stones.

Anup Shah1, Neil R Owen, Wei Lu, Bryan W Cunitz, Peter J Kaczkowski, Jonathan D Harper, Michael R Bailey, Lawrence A Crum.   

Abstract

The success of surgical management of lower pole stones is principally dependent on stone fragmentation and residual stone clearance. Choice of surgical method depends on stone size, yet all methods are subjected to post-surgical complications resulting from residual stone fragments. Here we present a novel method and device to reposition kidney stones using ultrasound radiation force delivered by focused ultrasound and guided by ultrasound imaging. The device couples a commercial imaging array with a focused annular array transducer. Feasibility of repositioning stones was investigated by implanting artificial and human stones into a kidney-mimicking phantom that simulated a lower pole and collecting system. During experiment, stones were located by ultrasound imaging and repositioned by delivering short bursts of focused ultrasound. Stone motion was concurrently monitored by fluoroscopy, ultrasound imaging, and video photography, from which displacement and velocity were estimated. Stones were seen to move immediately after delivering focused ultrasound and successfully repositioned from the lower pole to the collecting system. Estimated velocities were on the order of 1 cm/s. This in vitro study demonstrates a promising modality to facilitate spontaneous clearance of kidney stones and increased clearance of residual stone fragments after surgical management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20967437      PMCID: PMC3087440          DOI: 10.1007/s00240-010-0319-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  9 in total

1.  Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results.

Authors:  D M Albala; D G Assimos; R V Clayman; J D Denstedt; M Grasso; J Gutierrez-Aceves; R I Kahn; R J Leveillee; J E Lingeman; J N Macaluso; L C Munch; S Y Nakada; R C Newman; M S Pearle; G M Preminger; J Teichman; J R Woods
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Gel phantom for use in high-intensity focused ultrasound dosimetry.

Authors:  Cyril Lafon; Vesna Zderic; Misty L Noble; Jonathan C Yuen; Peter J Kaczkowski; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Francoise Chavrier; Lawrence A Crum; Shahram Vaezy
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower pole calculi: long-term radiographic and clinical outcome.

Authors:  R N Chen; S B Streem
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Randomized controlled study of mechanical percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy to assist passage of lower pole renal calculi after shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Edmund Chiong; Sandra Tay Poh Hwee; Li Man Kay; Shen Liang; Revathi Kamaraj; Kesavan Esuvaranathan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Limitations of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower caliceal stones: anatomic insight.

Authors:  F J Sampaio; A H Aragao
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Mechanical percussion, inversion and diuresis for residual lower pole fragments after shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  K T Pace; N Tariq; S J Dyer; M J Weir; R J D'A Honey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Jafi Lipson; Ralph Marcus; Kwang-Pyo Kim; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Robert Gould; Amy Berrington de González; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-14

8.  Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less.

Authors:  Margaret S Pearle; James E Lingeman; Raymond Leveillee; Ramsay Kuo; Glenn M Preminger; Robert B Nadler; Joseph Macaluso; Manoj Monga; Udaya Kumar; John Dushinski; David M Albala; J Stuart Wolf; Dean Assimos; Michael Fabrizio; Larry C Munch; Stephen Y Nakada; Brian Auge; John Honey; Kenneth Ogan; John Pattaras; Elspeth M McDougall; Timothy D Averch; Thomas Turk; Paul Pietrow; Stephanie Watkins
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Optimizing the fragmentation and clearance after shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Nitin S Kekre; Santosh Kumar
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.309

  9 in total
  25 in total

Review 1.  Innovations in Ultrasound Technology in the Management of Kidney Stones.

Authors:  Jessica C Dai; Michael R Bailey; Mathew D Sorensen; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 2.241

2.  Shock formation and nonlinear saturation effects in the ultrasound field of a diagnostic curvilinear probe.

Authors:  Maria M Karzova; Petr V Yuldashev; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Vera A Khokhlova; Bryan W Cunitz; Wayne Kreider; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Physical therapy in the management of stone fragments: progress, status, and needs.

Authors:  Suoshi Jing; Qiongyan Gai; Xin Zhao; Juan Wang; Yuwen Gong; Yangyang Pang; Chen Peng; Yuejun Tian; Yuhan Wang; Zhiping Wang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  Evaluation of dusting versus basketing - can new technologies improve stone-free rates?

Authors:  Brian Weiss; Ojas Shah
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Safety and Effectiveness of a Longer Focal Beam and Burst Duration in Ultrasonic Propulsion for Repositioning Urinary Stones and Fragments.

Authors:  Karmon M Janssen; Timothy C Brand; Bryan W Cunitz; Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Frank Starr; H Denny Liggitt; Jeff Thiel; Mathew D Sorensen; Jonathan D Harper; Michael R Bailey; Barbrina Dunmire
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  3aBAb5. Ultrasound intensity to propel stones from the kidney is below the threshold for renal injury.

Authors:  Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Bryan Cunitz; Frank Starr; Marla Paun; Denny Liggitt; Andrew Evan; James McAteer; James Williams; Ziyue Liu; Peter Kaczkowski; Ryan Hsi; Mathew Sorensen; Jonathan Harper; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2013-06

7.  Radiation force of an arbitrary acoustic beam on an elastic sphere in a fluid.

Authors:  Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Image-guided ultrasound phased arrays are a disruptive technology for non-invasive therapy.

Authors:  Kullervo Hynynen; Ryan M Jones
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Combined Burst Wave Lithotripsy and Ultrasonic Propulsion for Improved Urinary Stone Fragmentation.

Authors:  Theresa A Zwaschka; Justin S Ahn; Bryan W Cunitz; Michael R Bailey; Barbrina Dunmire; Mathew D Sorensen; Jonathan D Harper; Adam D Maxwell
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Focused ultrasound to expel calculi from the kidney: safety and efficacy of a clinical prototype device.

Authors:  Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Bryan W Cunitz; Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Frank Starr; Marla Paun; Barbrina Dunmire; H Denny Liggitt; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer; Ryan S Hsi; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.