Literature DB >> 7981732

Limitations of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower caliceal stones: anatomic insight.

F J Sampaio1, A H Aragao.   

Abstract

In addition to gravity-dependent position, we suppose that other particular anatomic features may be important in the retention of stone debris in lower calices after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). We analyzed the inferior-pole collecting system anatomy in 146 three-dimensional polyester resin corrosion endocasts of the pelviocaliceal system. In 74% of the cases, there was an angle of greater than 90 degrees formed between the lower infundibulum and the renal pelvis, and in 26%, the angle was 90 degrees or less. In 60%, there was a lower infundibulum 4 mm or larger in diameter. The inferior pole was drained by multiple calices disposed in two rows in 57% of the cases and by one midline caliceal infundibulum in 43%. We believe that the physician must appreciate these anatomic features when considering SWL to treat calculi located in lower calices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7981732     DOI: 10.1089/end.1994.8.241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  26 in total

Review 1.  Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-06-27

Review 2.  Arguments for choosing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for removal of urinary tract stones.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Adjunctive therapy to promote stone passage.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Nuss; Judson D Rackley; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

4.  The impact of radiological anatomy in clearance of lower caliceal stones after shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Mustafa Ozgür Tan; Lokman Irkilata; Ilker Sen; Metin Onaran; Bora Küpeli; Ustünol Karaoğlan; Ibrahim Bozkirli
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2007-04-20

5.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.

Authors:  Reem Al-Bareeq; John D Denstedt
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Retrograde transureteral approach: a safe and efficient treatment for recurrent cystine renal stones.

Authors:  Lorenzo Ruggera; Martina Zanin; Paolo Beltrami; Filiberto Zattoni
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-12-31

7.  The treatment of lower pole renal calculi in 2003.

Authors:  Brian R Matlaga; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

8.  Focused ultrasound to expel calculi from the kidney: safety and efficacy of a clinical prototype device.

Authors:  Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Bryan W Cunitz; Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Frank Starr; Marla Paun; Barbrina Dunmire; H Denny Liggitt; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer; Ryan S Hsi; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Optimal Management of Lower Polar Calyceal Stone 15 to 20 mm.

Authors:  Naveed Haroon; Syed M Nazim; M Hammad Ather
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-04-16

10.  Factors affecting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for unilateral urinary stones in children: a 17-year single-institute experience.

Authors:  U-Seok Jeong; Sinwoo Lee; Junghun Kang; Deok Hyun Han; Kwan Hyun Park; Minki Baek
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.