Literature DB >> 8863540

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower pole calculi: long-term radiographic and clinical outcome.

R N Chen1, S B Streem.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for lower pole calculi regarding immediate and long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 206 patients with isolated lower pole calculi in 220 renal units underwent ESWL for stones 4 to 625 mm2 (mean 88). Clinical and radiographic followup was obtained at 1 month and every 6 to 12 months thereafter. An initial stone-free rate was determined, as was the subsequent radiographic outcome. Clinical outcome with regard to a symptomatic episode or requiring intervention was also determined. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the probabilities of these outcomes with time were developed.
RESULTS: Of the 206 patients 99 (48%) were rendered stone-free by 1 month after ESWL. Another 13 patients (6.3%) spontaneously became stone-free within another 1 to 95 months (mean 17.5). Of the remaining patients residual stones were decreased, stable or increased in 13 (6.3%), 71 (34%) and 10 (4.8%), respectively, after 1 to 91 months (mean 14.5). Among all 206 patients 180 (87.4%) remained asymptomatic for 1 to 99 months, while 7 (3.4%) suffered a symptomatic episode requiring medical attention 1 to 40 months (mean 21.1) after ESWL and 19 (9.2%) required intervention after 1 to 91 months (mean 23.9). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the probabilities of a symptomatic episode or requiring intervention at 5 years were 0.24 and 0.52, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: ESWL is the initial treatment of choice for lower pole calculi smaller than 2 cm.2 because the stone-free rate is comparable to that for stones at other caliceal locations and, perhaps more importantly, the risk of a symptomatic episode or requiring secondary intervention is low even in the setting of residual fragments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8863540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  16 in total

Review 1.  Treatment update on pediatric urolithiasis.

Authors:  T Esen; A Krautschick; P Alken
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Estimating the effectiveness of various methods of evacuation of kidney stones, on the basis of data obtained on percentage of "stone free" and recurrent stone formation.

Authors:  V M Bilobrov; A Roy; S V Bilobrov
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  The impact of radiological anatomy in clearance of lower caliceal stones after shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Mustafa Ozgür Tan; Lokman Irkilata; Ilker Sen; Metin Onaran; Bora Küpeli; Ustünol Karaoğlan; Ibrahim Bozkirli
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2007-04-20

4.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.

Authors:  Reem Al-Bareeq; John D Denstedt
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  [Lower pole calyceal stones].

Authors:  U Nagele; T Knoll; D Schilling; M S Michel; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Renal anatomical factors for the lower calyceal stone formation.

Authors:  A Serdar Gozen; A Serkan Kilic; Tevfik Aktoz; Hakan Akdere
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  The treatment of lower pole renal calculi in 2003.

Authors:  Brian R Matlaga; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

8.  Novel ultrasound method to reposition kidney stones.

Authors:  Anup Shah; Neil R Owen; Wei Lu; Bryan W Cunitz; Peter J Kaczkowski; Jonathan D Harper; Michael R Bailey; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-10-22

9.  Focused ultrasound to expel calculi from the kidney: safety and efficacy of a clinical prototype device.

Authors:  Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Bryan W Cunitz; Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Frank Starr; Marla Paun; Barbrina Dunmire; H Denny Liggitt; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer; Ryan S Hsi; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Comparison of tissue injury from focused ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Bret A Connors; Andrew P Evan; Philip M Blomgren; Ryan S Hsi; Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Marla Paun; Frank Starr; Bryan W Cunitz; Michael R Bailey; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.