Literature DB >> 2096371

Sensitivity to the displacement of facial features in negative and inverted images.

R Kemp1, C McManus, T Pigott.   

Abstract

Subjects have previously been reported to show difficulties in recognising faces which are either inverted or in photographic negative. Experiments are reported in which a two-alternative forced-choice technique was used to measure sensitivity for distinguishing faces which have been modified by having the eyes moved vertically or horizontally. Subjects were less sensitive to such changes for inverted faces or negative faces, and were even less sensitive for faces that were both inverted and negative. No such effects were found for a control stimulus consisting simply of three solid circles in the same positions as the eyes and mouth of a face. When the stimuli consisted of eyes, nose, and mouth, but without a surround, no evidence of inversion or negation effects was found, which suggests that a facial surround is necessary. When the stimulus consisted of a facial surround with the eyes, nose, and mouth replaced by solid circles, effects of negation were found, but no effects of inversion. This dissociation of the effects of negation and inversion may suggest that they are the result of different underlying mechanisms.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2096371     DOI: 10.1068/p190531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  25 in total

1.  The role of movement in the recognition of famous faces.

Authors:  K Lander; F Christie; V Bruce
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-11

Review 2.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces.

Authors:  Nancy Kanwisher; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Higher-level mechanisms detect facial symmetry.

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes; Marianne Peters; Kieran Lee; M Concetta Morrone; David Burr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  The early development of face processing--what makes faces special?

Authors:  Stefanie Hoehl; Stefanie Peykarjou
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 5.203

5.  Explaining the face-inversion effect: the face-scheme incompatibility (FSI) model.

Authors:  Sam S Rakover
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

6.  The perception of two-tone Mooney faces in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.065

7.  The importance of surface-based cues for face discrimination in non-human primates.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Jessica Taubert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The influence of stimulus orientation on the vertex positive scalp potential evoked by faces.

Authors:  D A Jeffreys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A visual short-term memory advantage for objects of expertise.

Authors:  Kim M Curby; Kuba Glazek; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Personal familiarity influences the processing of upright and inverted faces in infants.

Authors:  Benjamin J Balas; Charles A Nelson; Alissa Westerlund; Vanessa Vogel-Farley; Tracy Riggins; Dana Kuefner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.