Literature DB >> 10586574

The role of movement in the recognition of famous faces.

K Lander1, F Christie, V Bruce.   

Abstract

The effects of movement on the recognition of famous faces shown in difficult conditions were investigated. Images were presented as negatives, upside down (inverted), and thresholded. Results indicate that, under all these conditions, moving faces were recognized significantly better than static ones. One possible explanation of this effect could be that a moving sequence contains more static information about the different views and expressions of the face than does a single static image. However, even when the amount of static information was equated (Experiments 3 and 4), there was still an advantage for moving sequences that contained their original dynamic properties. The results suggest that the dynamics of the motion provide additional information, helping to access an established familiar face representation. Both the theoretical and the practical implications for these findings are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10586574     DOI: 10.3758/bf03201228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  15 in total

1.  Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model.

Authors:  A M Burton; V Bruce; R A Johnston
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1990-08

2.  The role of dynamic information in the recognition of unfamiliar faces.

Authors:  F Christie; V Bruce
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-07

3.  Perception and recognition of normal and negative faces: the role of shape from shading and pigmentation cues.

Authors:  R Kemp; G Pike; P White; A Musselman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Emotion recognition: the role of facial movement and the relative importance of upper and lower areas of the face.

Authors:  J N Bassili
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1979-11

5.  The effects of different types of retrieval cues on the recall of names of famous faces.

Authors:  J R Hanley; E S Cowell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-11

6.  Parts and wholes in face recognition.

Authors:  J W Tanaka; M J Farah
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1993-05

7.  Resolving semantically induced tip-of-the-tongue states for proper nouns.

Authors:  T Brennen; T Baguley; J Bright; V Bruce
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-07

8.  Recognizing people seen in events via dynamic "mug shots".

Authors:  W Schiff; L Banka; G de Bordes Galdi
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1986

9.  Understanding face recognition.

Authors:  V Bruce; A Young
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1986-08

10.  The faces that launched a thousand slips: everyday difficulties and errors in recognizing people.

Authors:  A W Young; D C Hay; A W Ellis
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1985-11
View more
  34 in total

1.  Repetition priming from moving faces.

Authors:  Karen Lander; Vicki Bruce
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-06

2.  The contribution of symmetry and motion to the recognition of faces at novel orientations.

Authors:  Thomas A Busey; Safa R Zaki
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-09

3.  A search advantage for faces learned in motion.

Authors:  Karin S Pilz; Ian M Thornton; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Memory for moving and static images.

Authors:  W J Matthews; Clare Benjamin; Claire Osborne
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

5.  Emotion unfolded by motion: a role for parietal lobe in decoding dynamic facial expressions.

Authors:  Pegah Sarkheil; Rainer Goebel; Frank Schneider; Klaus Mathiak
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 6.  The composite face illusion.

Authors:  Jennifer Murphy; Katie L H Gray; Richard Cook
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

7.  Rigid facial motion influences featural, but not holistic, face processing.

Authors:  Naiqi G Xiao; Paul C Quinn; Liezhong Ge; Kang Lee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The efficiency of dynamic and static facial expression recognition.

Authors:  Jason M Gold; Jarrett D Barker; Shawn Barr; Jennifer L Bittner; W Drew Bromfield; Nicole Chu; Roy A Goode; Doori Lee; Michael Simmons; Aparna Srinath
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Intersensory redundancy hinders face discrimination in preschool children: evidence for visual facilitation.

Authors:  Lorraine E Bahrick; Sheila Krogh-Jespersen; Melissa A Argumosa; Hassel Lopez
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2013-06-24

10.  Perception of dynamic changes in facial affect and identity in autism.

Authors:  Kevin A Pelphrey; James P Morris; Gregory McCarthy; Kevin S Labar
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.