Literature DB >> 16006321

Higher-level mechanisms detect facial symmetry.

Gillian Rhodes1, Marianne Peters, Kieran Lee, M Concetta Morrone, David Burr.   

Abstract

The role of symmetry detection in early visual processing and the sensitivity of biological visual systems to symmetry across a wide range of organisms suggest that symmetry can be detected by low-level visual mechanisms. However, computational and functional considerations suggest that higher-level mechanisms may also play a role in facial symmetry detection. We tested this hypothesis by examining whether symmetry detection is better for faces than comparable patterns, which share low-level properties with faces. Symmetry detection was better for upright faces than for inverted faces (experiment 1) and contrast-reversed faces (experiment 2), implicating high-level mechanisms in facial symmetry detection. In addition, facial symmetry detection was sensitive to spatial scale, unlike low-level symmetry detection mechanisms (experiment 3), and showed greater sensitivity to a 45 degrees deviation from vertical than is found for other aspects of face perception (experiment 4). These results implicate specialized, higher-level mechanisms in the detection of facial symmetry. This specialization may reflect perceptual learning resulting from extensive experience detecting symmetry in faces or evolutionary selection pressures associated with the important role of facial symmetry in mate choice and 'mind-reading' or both.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16006321      PMCID: PMC1560337          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  38 in total

1.  Facial attractiveness.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Evidence for holistic processing of faces viewed as photographic negatives.

Authors:  G J Hole; P A George; V Dunsmore
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Preserved figure-ground segregation and symmetry perception in visual neglect.

Authors:  J Driver; G C Baylis; R D Rafal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-11-05       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  How does the brain process upright and inverted faces?

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev       Date:  2002-03

5.  Symmetry and perceived facial attractiveness: a monozygotic co-twin comparison.

Authors:  L Mealey; R Bridgstock; G C Townsend
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-01

6.  The Thatcher illusion as a test of configural disruption.

Authors:  M B Lewis; R A Johnston
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  The Yin and the Yang of visuo-spatial neglect: a case study.

Authors:  J C Marshall; P W Halligan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Are average and symmetric faces attractive to infants? Discrimination and looking preferences.

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes; Keren Geddes; Linda Jeffery; Suzanne Dziurawiec; Alison Clark
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition.

Authors:  M Moscovitch; G Winocur; M Behrmann
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  20 in total

1.  [Facial aesthetics part I - the significance of the triangle of yarbus].

Authors:  Ingo N Springer; Oliver Zernial; Jörg Wiltfang; Patrick H Warnke; Hendrik Terheyden; Stefan Wolfart
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-08

2.  The Fusiform Face Area responds automatically to statistical regularities optimal for face categorization.

Authors:  Roberto Caldara; Mohamed L Seghier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Attraction independent of detection suggests special mechanisms for symmetry preferences in human face perception.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Symmetrical Viewpoint Representations in Face-Selective Regions Convey an Advantage in the Perception and Recognition of Faces.

Authors:  Tessa R Flack; Richard J Harris; Andrew W Young; Timothy J Andrews
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Enhanced Facial Symmetry Assessment in Orthodontists.

Authors:  Tate H Jackson; Kait Clark; Stephen R Mitroff
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2013

6.  Detecting symmetry and faces: separating the tasks and identifying their interactions.

Authors:  Rebecca M Jones; Jonathan D Victor; Mary M Conte
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Face symmetry assessment abilities: Clinical implications for diagnosing asymmetry.

Authors:  Tate H Jackson; Stephen R Mitroff; Kait Clark; William R Proffit; Jessica Y Lee; Tung T Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  [Facial aesthetics Part II - effect of symmetric and asymmetric modulations of the orbital region].

Authors:  Ingo N Springer; Björn Wannicke; Jörg Wiltfang; Patrick H Warnke; Oliver Zernial; Stefan Wolfart
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-09

9.  Depth structure from asymmetric shading supports face discrimination.

Authors:  Chien-Chung Chen; Chin-Mei Chen; Christopher W Tyler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Stimulus requirements for face perception: an analysis based on "totem poles".

Authors:  Carrie L Paras; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.