Literature DB >> 22737182

The perception of two-tone Mooney faces in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Jessica Taubert, Lisa A Parr.   

Abstract

Neurological experiments have revealed a complex network of areas in the human brain that respond more to faces than to other categories of objects and thus have been implemented in face categorization. The aim of this study was to investigate whether chimpanzees (n = 5), our closest living relatives, detect and categorize faces on the basis of first-order information, and whether this sensitivity is specific to faces or generalizes to other objects. In service to this aim, we created multiple categories of two-tone 'Mooney' objects (chimpanzee faces, shoes, human hands), because, by maximizing contrast, the Mooney transformation selectively degrades second-order information (the basis for individual discrimination in humans), leaving only first-order information intact. Two experiments used a 2AFC MTS procedure. The first experiment provided strong evidence that, like humans, chimpanzees categorize Mooney faces as faces. However, without second-order information, the chimpanzees could not match Mooney faces at the individual level. In Experiment 2, four of the five chimpanzees found it easier to categorize Mooney faces than Mooney shoes. Neurological evidence strongly indicates a dedicated neural mechanism for face categorization in the human brain, and our data suggest that chimpanzees share this level of specialization.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22737182      PMCID: PMC3377185          DOI: 10.1080/17588928.2011.578737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 1758-8928            Impact factor:   3.065


  24 in total

1.  Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing.

Authors:  Catherine J Mondloch; Richard Le Grand; Daphne Maurer
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Sparsely-distributed organization of face and limb activations in human ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  Kevin S Weiner; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Is it an animal? Is it a human face? Fast processing in upright and inverted natural scenes.

Authors:  Guillaume A Rousselet; Marc J-M Macé; Michèle Fabre-Thorpe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Sensitivity to the displacement of facial features in negative and inverted images.

Authors:  R Kemp; C McManus; T Pigott
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence.

Authors:  A Freire; K Lee; L A Symons
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Recovery of 3D volume from 2-tone images of novel objects.

Authors:  C Moore; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-07

Review 7.  CONSPEC and CONLERN: a two-process theory of infant face recognition.

Authors:  J Morton; M H Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Geometric distortions affect face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Face processing in the chimpanzee brain.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Erin Hecht; Sarah K Barks; Todd M Preuss; John R Votaw
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition.

Authors:  M Moscovitch; G Winocur; M Behrmann
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  4 in total

1.  On the number of trials needed to distinguish similar alternatives.

Authors:  Flavio Chierichetti; Ravi Kumar; Andrew Tomkins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Efficient search for a face by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Masaki Tomonaga; Tomoko Imura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Responses of chimpanzees to cues of conspecific observation.

Authors:  Daniel Nettle; Katherine A Cronin; Melissa Bateson
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Mooney face stimuli for visual perception research.

Authors:  Caspar M Schwiedrzik; Lucia Melloni; Aaron Schurger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.