Literature DB >> 20963530

Femoral head size does not affect ion values in metal-on-metal total hips.

Mitchell Bernstein1, Alan Walsh, Alain Petit, David J Zukor, Olga L Huk, John Antoniou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metal-on-metal articulations can release substantial amounts of particles containing cobalt and chromium into the surrounding milieu, causing concern for cellular toxicity and adverse local soft tissue reactions. The diameter of the femoral head has been one of the variables that inversely affects wear of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (THA). The oxidative stress of increased metal ions can be measured with serum markers. It is still controversial if larger femoral head diameters decrease wear rates in patients with metal-on-metal THA and if the increased metal ions alter the body's antioxidant status. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore (1) determined whole blood metal ions in patients with small (28 mm and 36 mm) and large (40 mm and 44 mm) diameter femoral heads; (2) measured oxidative stress markers (total antioxidants, nitrotyrosine, and peroxides); and (3) determined whether acetabular version or inclination influenced ion levels.
METHODS: One hundred four patients were retrospectively studied. We recorded Harris hip scores and UCLA activity scores. All patients were followed at 1 year.
RESULTS: The activity scores were similar in the two groups. There was no difference in metal ion levels or oxidative stress markers between patients with small- or large-diameter femoral heads. Acetabular inclination and anteversion had no effect on the metal ion levels.
CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest there is no difference in ion values in patients with large or small metal-on-metal THA and the increased metal ions do not alter the oxidant status of the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20963530      PMCID: PMC3094634          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1630-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  57 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers of oxidative stress: an analytical approach.

Authors:  P Thérond; D Bonnefont-Rousselot; A Davit-Spraul; M Conti; A Legrand
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.294

2.  In vivo wear of three types of metal on metal hip prostheses during two decades of use.

Authors:  H McKellop; S H Park; R Chiesa; P Doorn; B Lu; P Normand; P Grigoris; H Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Development of a routine method for the determination of trace metals in whole blood by magnetic sector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry with particular relevance to patients with total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  C P Case; L Ellis; J C Turner; B Fairman
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  EBRA: a method to measure migration of acetabular components.

Authors:  M Krismer; R Bauer; J Tschupik; P Mayrhofer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Metal-on-metal bearing in hip prosthesis generates 100-fold less wear debris than metal-on-polyethylene.

Authors:  H L Anissian; A Stark; A Gustafson; V Good; I C Clarke
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1999-12

7.  A study on the effects of particulate metals of orthopaedic interest on murine macrophages in vitro.

Authors:  T Rae
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1975-11

8.  The John Charnley Award. Wear is a function of use, not time.

Authors:  T P Schmalzried; E F Shepherd; F J Dorey; W O Jackson; M dela Rosa; F Fa'vae; H A McKellop; C D McClung; J Martell; J R Moreland; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Long-term results using the anatomic medullary locking hip prosthesis.

Authors:  C A Engh; A M Claus; R H Hopper; C A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings.

Authors:  H Pandit; S Glyn-Jones; P McLardy-Smith; R Gundle; D Whitwell; C L M Gibbons; S Ostlere; N Athanasou; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-07
View more
  10 in total

1.  Comparison between component designs with different femoral head size in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty; multicenter randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Wataru Ando; Kengo Yamamoto; Takashi Atsumi; Satoshi Tamaoki; Kazuhiro Oinuma; Hideaki Shiratsuchi; Hirohiko Tokunaga; Yutaka Inaba; Naomi Kobayashi; Masaharu Aihara; Kenji Ohzono
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-06-10

2.  Edge-loading severity as a function of cup lip radius in metal-on-metal total hips--a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jacob M Elkins; Karen M Kruger; Douglas R Pedersen; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  The 2014 Frank Stinchfield Award: The 'landing zone' for wear and stability in total hip arthroplasty is smaller than we thought: a computational analysis.

Authors:  Jacob M Elkins; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Influence of implant design on blood metal ion concentrations in metal-on-metal total hip replacement patients.

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Fiona Berryman; Lesley Brash; Paul B Pynsent; Ronan B Treacy; David J Dunlop
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  What are the predictors and prevalence of pseudotumor and elevated metal ions after large-diameter metal-on-metal THA?

Authors:  Nick Bayley; Habeeb Khan; Paul Grosso; Thomas Hupel; David Stevens; Matthew Snider; Emil Schemitsch; Paul Kuzyk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Orthopedic Surgeons' Accuracy When Orienting an Acetabular Cup. A Comparison with Untrained Individuals.

Authors:  Jesús Moreta; Óscar Gayoso; Daniel Donaire-Hoyas; Jorge Roces-García; Jesús Gómez-Vallejo; Esther Moya-Gómez; David Raya-Roldán; Alberto Albert-Ullibarri; Fernando Marqués-López; Jorge Albareda
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 2.948

7.  Does Choice of Head Size and Neck Geometry Affect Stem Migration in Modular Large-Diameter Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Preliminary Analysis.

Authors:  Cs Georgiou; Kg Evangelou; Eg Theodorou; Cg Provatidis; Pd Megas
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-12-14

Review 8.  Chromium and cobalt ion concentrations in blood and serum following various types of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: a literature overview.

Authors:  Christopher Jantzen; Henrik L Jørgensen; Benn R Duus; Sune L Sporring; Jes B Lauritzen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Does bearing size influence metal ion levels in large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty? A comparison of three total hip systems.

Authors:  James Smith; David Lee; Kamal Bali; Pam Railton; David Kinniburgh; Peter Faris; Deborah Marshall; Brian Burkart; James Powell
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  What is appropriate surveillance for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients?

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Andrew Judge; Antti Eskelinen; David W Murray; Hemant G Pandit
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.717

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.