Literature DB >> 23109068

Proximal femoral density distribution and structure in relation to age and hip fracture risk in women.

Julio Carballido-Gamio1, Roy Harnish, Isra Saeed, Timothy Streeper, Sigurdur Sigurdsson, Shreyasee Amin, Elizabeth J Atkinson, Terry M Therneau, Kristin Siggeirsdottir, Xiaoguang Cheng, L Joseph Melton, Joyce Keyak, Vilmundur Gudnason, Sundeep Khosla, Tamara B Harris, Thomas F Lang.   

Abstract

Hip fracture risk rises exponentially with age, but there is little knowledge about how fracture-related alterations in hip structure differ from those of aging. We employed computed tomography (CT) imaging to visualize the three-dimensional (3D) spatial distribution of bone mineral density (BMD) in the hip in relation to age and incident hip fracture. We used intersubject image registration to integrate 3D hip CT images into a statistical atlas comprising women aged 21 to 97 years (n = 349) and a group of women with (n = 74) and without (n = 148) incident hip fracture 4 to 7 years after their imaging session. Voxel-based morphometry was used to generate Student's t test statistical maps from the atlas, which indicated regions that were significantly associated with age or with incident hip fracture. Scaling factors derived from intersubject image registration were employed as measures of bone size. BMD comparisons of young, middle-aged, and older American women showed preservation of load-bearing cortical and trabecular structures with aging, whereas extensive bone loss was observed in other trabecular and cortical regions. In contrast, comparisons of older Icelandic fracture women with age-matched controls showed that hip fracture was associated with a global cortical bone deficit, including both the superior cortical margin and the load-bearing inferior cortex. Bone size comparisons showed larger dimensions in older compared to younger American women and in older Icelandic fracture women compared to controls. The results indicate that older Icelandic women who sustain incident hip fracture have a structural phenotype that cannot be described as an accelerated pattern of normal age-related loss. The fracture-related cortical deficit noted in this study may provide a biomarker of increased hip fracture risk that may be translatable to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and other clinical images.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23109068      PMCID: PMC3578081          DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  34 in total

1.  A unified statistical approach to deformation-based morphometry.

Authors:  M K Chung; K J Worsley; T Paus; C Cherif; D L Collins; J N Giedd; J L Rapoport; A C Evans
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Morphological and structural characteristics of the proximal femur in human and rat.

Authors:  C M Bagi; D Wilkie; K Georgelos; D Williams; D Bertolini
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Structure of the femoral neck in hip fracture: cortical bone loss in the inferoanterior to superoposterior axis.

Authors:  K L Bell; N Loveridge; J Power; N Garrahan; M Stanton; M Lunt; B F Meggitt; J Reeve
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Improving risk assessment: hip geometry, bone mineral distribution and bone strength in hip fracture cases and controls. The EPOS study. European Prospective Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  N J Crabtree; H Kroger; A Martin; H A P Pols; R Lorenc; J Nijs; J J Stepan; J A Falch; T Miazgowski; S Grazio; P Raptou; J Adams; A Collings; K T Khaw; N Rushton; M Lunt; A K Dixon; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling.

Authors:  J H Keyak; S A Rossi; K A Jones; H B Skinner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Relation between age, femoral neck cortical stability, and hip fracture risk.

Authors:  Paul M Mayhew; C David Thomas; John G Clement; Nigel Loveridge; Thomas J Beck; William Bonfield; Chris J Burgoyne; Jonathan Reeve
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jul 9-15       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Osteoclastic cortical erosion as a determinant of subperiosteal osteoblastic bone formation in the femoral neck's response to BMU imbalance. Effects of stance-related loading and hip fracture.

Authors:  J Power; N Loveridge; A Lyon; N Rushton; M Parker; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-11-26       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Population-based study of age and sex differences in bone volumetric density, size, geometry, and structure at different skeletal sites.

Authors:  B Lawrence Riggs; L Joseph Melton Iii; Richard A Robb; Jon J Camp; Elizabeth J Atkinson; James M Peterson; Peggy A Rouleau; Cynthia H McCollough; Mary L Bouxsein; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-09-20       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Less white matter concentration in autism: 2D voxel-based morphometry.

Authors:  Moo K Chung; Kim M Dalton; Andrew L Alexander; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Hip section modulus, a measure of bending resistance, is more strongly related to reported physical activity than BMD.

Authors:  S Kaptoge; N Dalzell; R W Jakes; N Wareham; N E Day; K T Khaw; T J Beck; N Loveridge; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-09-02       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  29 in total

1.  Automatic multi-parametric quantification of the proximal femur with quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Serena Bonaretti; Isra Saeed; Roy Harnish; Robert Recker; Andrew J Burghardt; Joyce H Keyak; Tamara Harris; Sundeep Khosla; Thomas F Lang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-08

2.  Trabecular Plate Loss and Deteriorating Elastic Modulus of Femoral Trabecular Bone in Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures.

Authors:  Ji Wang; Bin Zhou; Ian Parkinson; C David L Thomas; John G Clement; Nick Fazzalari; X Edward Guo
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 13.567

3.  Spatial Differences in the Distribution of Bone Between Femoral Neck and Trochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  Aihong Yu; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Ling Wang; Thomas F Lang; Yongbin Su; Xinbao Wu; Manyi Wang; Jie Wei; Chen Yi; Xiaoguang Cheng
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  The Association Between BMI and QCT-Derived Proximal Hip Structure and Strength in Older Men: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Jian Shen; Carrie M Nielson; Lynn M Marshall; David C Lee; Tony M Keaveny; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 5.  Micro-Finite Element Analysis of the Proximal Femur on the Basis of High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Images.

Authors:  Chamith S Rajapakse; Gregory Chang
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  MRI-based assessment of proximal femur strength compared to mechanical testing.

Authors:  Chamith S Rajapakse; Alexander R Farid; Daniel C Kargilis; Brandon C Jones; Jae S Lee; Alyssa J Johncola; Alexandra S Batzdorf; Snehal S Shetye; Michael W Hast; Gregory Chang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Physical activity induced adaptation can increase proximal femur strength under loading from a fall onto the greater trochanter.

Authors:  Robyn K Fuchs; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Joyce H Keyak; Mariana E Kersh; Stuart J Warden
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  Opportunistic Screening for Osteoporosis Using Computed Tomography: State of the Art and Argument for Paradigm Shift.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Ashley A Weaver; Robert J Ward; John M Boone; Robert D Boutin
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 9.  Physical Activity for Strengthening Fracture Prone Regions of the Proximal Femur.

Authors:  Robyn K Fuchs; Mariana E Kersh; Julio Carballido-Gamio; William R Thompson; Joyce H Keyak; Stuart J Warden
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Spatial heterogeneity in the response of the proximal femur to two lower-body resistance exercise regimens.

Authors:  Thomas F Lang; Isra H Saeed; Timothy Streeper; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Roy J Harnish; Lynda A Frassetto; Stuart M C Lee; Jean D Sibonga; Joyce H Keyak; Barry A Spiering; Carlos M Grodsinsky; Jacob J Bloomberg; Peter R Cavanagh
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.