Literature DB >> 20924407

Empowerment: qualitative underpinning of a new clinical genetics-specific patient-reported outcome.

Marion McAllister1, Graham Dunn, Chris Todd.   

Abstract

Recent qualitative research developed a new construct labelled Empowerment describing a new patient outcome from using clinical genetics services that included four dimensions: Knowledge and Understanding, Decision-Making, Instrumentality and Future-Orientation. The aim of this study was to explore the validity, relevance and importance of the Empowerment construct for use as a patient-reported outcome (PRO) for clinical genetics services, and to refine the construct if necessary. Qualitative research (interviews and focus groups) was conducted in the UK with 12 patients, 15 representatives from patient support groups, 10 genetics clinicians and 4 service commissioners. Participants were asked to (1) describe what they think are the patient benefits from using clinical genetics services and (2) critique the Empowerment construct as a PRO. Interviews and focus groups were transcribed in full and analyzed using grounded theory. Findings confirmed the relevance and importance of the Empowerment construct, and identified Emotional Regulation as a further dimension of Empowerment. Data analysis also resulted in refinement of the construct, by renaming the other four dimensions to be Cognitive Control, Decisional Control, Behavioural Control and Hope. Empowerment has the potential to be a useful PRO to evaluate interventions in clinical genetics, and for use in clinical practice to generate data for continuous quality improvement. A study is underway to operationalise Empowerment by developing a psychometrically sound PRO measure that will take the form of a short questionnaire.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20924407      PMCID: PMC3021496          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  19 in total

1.  Process studies in genetic counseling: peering into the black box.

Authors:  B B Biesecker; K F Peters
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001

2.  Evaluating genetic counseling: client expectations, psychological adjustment and satisfaction with service.

Authors:  Angela Davey; Kristie Rostant; Karen Harrop; Jack Goldblatt; Peter O'Leary
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Genetic health technology and economic evaluation: a critical review.

Authors:  James Jarrett; Miranda Mugford
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.561

4.  Satisfaction with genetic counseling: dimensions and measurement.

Authors:  S Shiloh; O Avdor; R M Goodman
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1990-12

5.  Perceived personal control (PPC): a new concept in measuring outcome of genetic counseling.

Authors:  M Berkenstadt; S Shiloh; G Barkai; M B Katznelson; B Goldman
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1999-01-01

6.  Reconsidering patient empowerment in chronic illness: a critique of models of self-efficacy and bodily control.

Authors:  Isabelle Aujoulat; Renzo Marcolongo; Leopoldo Bonadiman; Alain Deccache
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Health-related quality of life measures in genetic disorders: an outcome variable for consideration in clinical trials.

Authors:  David A Stevenson; John C Carey
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 3.908

8.  The emotional effects of genetic diseases: implications for clinical genetics.

Authors:  Marion McAllister; Linda Davies; Katherine Payne; Stuart Nicholls; Dian Donnai; Rhona MacLeod
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Autism and social movements: French parents' associations and international autistic individuals' organisations.

Authors:  Brigitte Chamak
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2008-01

10.  Improving service evaluation in clinical genetics: identifying effects of genetic diseases on individuals and families.

Authors:  Marion McAllister; Katherine Payne; Stuart Nicholls; Rhona MacLeod; Dian Donnai; Linda M Davies
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 2.537

View more
  25 in total

1.  Genetics Health Professionals' Views on Quality of Genetic Counseling Service Provision for Presymptomatic Testing in Late-Onset Neurological Diseases in Portugal: Core Components, Specific Challenges and the Need for Assessment Tools.

Authors:  M Paneque; Á Mendes; L Guimarães; J Sequeiros; H Skirton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  From constraints to opportunities? Provision of psychosocial support in portuguese oncogenetic counseling services.

Authors:  Alvaro Mendes; Liliana Sousa; Milena Paneque
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Translation and Adaptation of the Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24) for Use in Denmark.

Authors:  Birgitte Rode Diness; Gritt Overbeck; Tina Duelund Hjortshøj; Trine Bjørg Hammer; Susanne Timshel; Else Sørensen; Marion McAllister
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Are family-oriented interventions in Portuguese genetics services a remote possibility? Professionals' views on a multifamily intervention for cancer susceptibility families.

Authors:  Alvaro Mendes; Milena Paneque; Liliana Sousa
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-02-08

5.  Identifying outcomes of clinical genetic services: qualitative evidence and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Christalla Pithara
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.

Authors:  Paula R Williamson; Douglas G Altman; Heather Bagley; Karen L Barnes; Jane M Blazeby; Sara T Brookes; Mike Clarke; Elizabeth Gargon; Sarah Gorst; Nicola Harman; Jamie J Kirkham; Angus McNair; Cecilia A C Prinsen; Jochen Schmitt; Caroline B Terwee; Bridget Young
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation with Preliminary Validation of GCOS-24 for Use in Spain.

Authors:  Patricia Muñoz-Cabello; Sixto García-Miñaúr; Manuel Eliecer Espinel-Vallejo; Lorenzo Fernández-Franco; Alexandra Stephens; Fernando Santos-Simarro; Pablo Lapunzina-Badía; Marion McAllister
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Patient expectations and attitudes towards specialist genetic eye services.

Authors:  E Clarke; R Combs; G Black; G Hall
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Disability Experiences and Perspectives Regarding Reproductive Decisions, Parenting, and the Utility of Genetic Services: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  C Roadhouse; C Shuman; K Anstey; K Sappleton; D Chitayat; E Ignagni
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  "To perpetuate blindness!": attitudes of UK patients with inherited retinal disease towards genetic testing.

Authors:  Barbara Potrata; Martin McKibbin; Jennifer Nw Lim; Jenny Hewison
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-12-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.