Literature DB >> 2260600

Satisfaction with genetic counseling: dimensions and measurement.

S Shiloh1, O Avdor, R M Goodman.   

Abstract

Patient satisfaction has become a significant issue in evaluating medical care, although it has been largely neglected in genetic counseling. A 32-item questionnaire was designed to examine patient satisfaction and was administered to 76 clients in a genetic counseling center, and 56 parents attending a pediatric outpatient clinic (the control group). Factor analysis showed 3 dimensions to satisfaction with genetic counseling: instrumental, affective, and procedural. The general level of satisfaction was found to be lower in the genetic counseling group than in the control group. This finding was interpreted as expressing basic properties of genetic counseling. The most important determinant of satisfaction in both groups was satisfaction with the content of information provided in counseling. Some affective and procedural aspects of genetic counseling were found more satisfying, and more important in determining genetic clients' general sense of satisfaction, as compared to the control subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2260600     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320370419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  48 in total

1.  "Respect for autonomy" in genetic counseling: an analysis and a proposal.

Authors:  Mary Terrell White
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Client perceptions of the impact of genetic counseling: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Patricia McCarthy Veach; Sarah E Truesdell; Bonnie S LeRoy; Dianne M Bartels
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Empowerment: qualitative underpinning of a new clinical genetics-specific patient-reported outcome.

Authors:  Marion McAllister; Graham Dunn; Chris Todd
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Recommendation recall and satisfaction after attending breast/ovarian cancer risk counseling.

Authors:  Sharon L Bober; Lizbeth A Hoke; Rosemary B Duda; Nadine M Tung
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-04       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Genetic counseling: the impact in Indian milieu.

Authors:  Shubha R Phadke; Amita Pandey; Ratna Dua Puri; S J Patil
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  Evaluating genetic counseling: client expectations, psychological adjustment and satisfaction with service.

Authors:  Angela Davey; Kristie Rostant; Karen Harrop; Jack Goldblatt; Peter O'Leary
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Women's satisfaction with genetic counseling for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer: psychological aspects.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Tiffani A Demarco; Bryn D Mars; Beth N Peshkin
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Why Do Parents Want to Know their Child's Carrier Status? A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Clare Delany; John Massie; Lynn Gillam
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Evaluation of a Streamlined Oncologist-Led BRCA Mutation Testing and Counseling Model for Patients With Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Nicoletta Colombo; Gloria Huang; Giovanni Scambia; Eva Chalas; Sandro Pignata; James Fiorica; Linda Van Le; Sharad Ghamande; Santiago González-Santiago; Isabel Bover; Begoña Graña Suárez; Andrew Green; Philippe Huot-Marchand; Yann Bourhis; Sudeep Karve; Christopher Blakeley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.