Literature DB >> 24037031

Identifying outcomes of clinical genetic services: qualitative evidence and methodological considerations.

Christalla Pithara1.   

Abstract

Extensive research into the tangible and intangible implications of Clinical Genetic Services (CGSs) has confirmed the relevance of a multidimensional outcome of benefit conceptually linked to perceived control. This paper aims to report qualitative findings from one small study aiming to add to the evidence pool confirming the relevance of such an outcome to participants from one UK clinical genetics center. Data were collected using focus groups and individual interviews with 22 service users from the following conditions: Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC), von Hippel Lindau disorder (VHL), Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy (DBMD), cystic fibrosis (CF) and tuberous sclerosis (TS). Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis and four dimensions of benefit were identified relating to cognitive, behavioral, social and emotional consequences. These dimensions related to an overarching conceptual outcome described as Perceived Familial Control. Findings are discussed to illustrate the inter-generational and intra-generational familial dimensions of CGSs and reinforce the significance of a familial focus to any genetics-specific outcome measure. The prospect and methodological considerations of a familial composite outcome measure for measuring overall benefit of CGSs is discussed based on current and past findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24037031     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9654-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  20 in total

1.  Empowerment: qualitative underpinning of a new clinical genetics-specific patient-reported outcome.

Authors:  Marion McAllister; Graham Dunn; Chris Todd
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Evaluating genetic counseling: client expectations, psychological adjustment and satisfaction with service.

Authors:  Angela Davey; Kristie Rostant; Karen Harrop; Jack Goldblatt; Peter O'Leary
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Are all outcomes in chronic heart failure rated equally? An argument for a patient-centred approach to outcome assessment.

Authors:  Sungwon Chang; Phillip J Newton; Sally Inglis; Tim Luckett; Henry Krum; Peter Macdonald; Patricia M Davidson
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  The Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale: a new patient-reported outcome measure for clinical genetics services.

Authors:  M McAllister; A M Wood; G Dunn; S Shiloh; C Todd
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Why do women attend familial breast cancer clinics?

Authors:  K Brain; J Gray; P Norman; E Parsons; A Clarke; C Rogers; R Mansel; P Harper
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Health economics and genetic service development: a familial cancer genetic example.

Authors:  David Cohen; Garry Barton; Jonathon Gray; Kate Brain
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Barriers to participating in genetic counseling and BRCA testing during primary treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn J Schlich-Bakker; Herman F J ten Kroode; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Jan van den Bout; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 8.  Provision of genetic services in Europe: current practices and issues.

Authors:  Béatrice Godard; Helena Kääriäinen; Ulf Kristoffersson; Lisbeth Tranebjaerg; Domenico Coviello; Ségolène Aymé
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 9.  Definition, reporting, and interpretation of composite outcomes in clinical trials: systematic review.

Authors:  Gloria Cordoba; Lisa Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; Harold Bae; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-08-18

10.  Outcome measures for clinical genetics services: a comparison of genetics healthcare professionals and patients' views.

Authors:  Katherine Payne; Stuart G Nicholls; Marion McAllister; Rhona MacLeod; Ian Ellis; Dian Donnai; Linda M Davies
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 2.980

View more
  3 in total

1.  Are Australasian Genetic Counselors Interested in Private Practice at the Primary Care Level of Health Service?

Authors:  Vrunda Sane; Linda Humphreys; Madelyn Peterson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Defining Our Clinical Practice: The Identification of Genetic Counseling Outcomes Utilizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model.

Authors:  Krista Redlinger-Grosse; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Stephanie Cohen; Bonnie S LeRoy; Ian M MacFarlane; Heather Zierhut
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Development of FOCUS-GC: Framework for Outcomes of Clinical Communication Services in Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Heather Zierhut
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.537

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.