Literature DB >> 24366860

"To perpetuate blindness!": attitudes of UK patients with inherited retinal disease towards genetic testing.

Barbara Potrata1, Martin McKibbin, Jennifer Nw Lim, Jenny Hewison.   

Abstract

Availability and accuracy of genetic testing in ophthalmology has increased yet the benefits are unclear especially for those conditions where cure or treatments are limited. To explore attitudes to and patients' understanding of possible advantages and disadvantages of genetic testing for inherited retinal disease, we undertook focus groups in three West Yorkshire towns in the UK. Most of our participants had retinitis pigmentosa and one of the focus groups consisted of participants from (British) Asian ethnic background. Here, we report only those attitudes which were common in all three focus groups. Some of the attitudes have already been reported in the literature. Novel findings include attitudes held towards informed choice and life planning, particularly among more severely affected participants. For example, participants appreciated that genetic testing increases informed choice and enables life planning, but these understandings tended to be in a specific sense: informed choice whether to have children and family planning in order to prevent illness recurrence. We conclude that even though these patients are not a homogeneous group, their attitudes tend to be underpinned by deep anxiety of passing their visual impairment onto their children. In this respect, they differ importantly from a small minority of the deaf who would prefer to have children with hearing loss, and from the more general population who do not believe that blindness is a "severe" enough disability to warrant avoiding having children.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24366860      PMCID: PMC4059844          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-013-0176-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  29 in total

1.  Disability rights, prenatal diagnosis and eugenics: a cross-cultural view.

Authors:  Aviad E Raz
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  The Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale: a new patient-reported outcome measure for clinical genetics services.

Authors:  M McAllister; A M Wood; G Dunn; S Shiloh; C Todd
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 3.  Genetic counseling of the deaf. Medical and cultural considerations.

Authors:  K S Arnos; J Israel; M Cunningham
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Qualitative research methodology in the exploration of patients' perceptions of participating in a genetic research program.

Authors:  Frieda Basson; Merle Joyce Futter; Jacquie Greenberg
Journal:  Ophthalmic Genet       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.803

5.  Assessment of clinical variables and counseling needs in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  J A Boughman; R J Caldwell
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1982-06

6.  The effect of BRCA gene testing on family relationships: A thematic analysis of qualitative interviews.

Authors:  Heather A Douglas; Rebekah J Hamilton; Robin E Grubs
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Transplantation of adult mouse iPS cell-derived photoreceptor precursors restores retinal structure and function in degenerative mice.

Authors:  Budd A Tucker; In-Hyun Park; Sara D Qi; Henry J Klassen; Caihui Jiang; Jing Yao; Stephen Redenti; George Q Daley; Michael J Young
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Promises of stem cell therapy for retinal degenerative diseases.

Authors:  Ian Yat-Hin Wong; Ming-Wai Poon; Rosita Tsz-Wai Pang; Qizhou Lian; David Wong
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Gene therapy for Leber's congenital amaurosis is safe and effective through 1.5 years after vector administration.

Authors:  Francesca Simonelli; Albert M Maguire; Francesco Testa; Eric A Pierce; Federico Mingozzi; Jeannette L Bennicelli; Settimio Rossi; Kathleen Marshall; Sandro Banfi; Enrico M Surace; Junwei Sun; T Michael Redmond; Xiaosong Zhu; Kenneth S Shindler; Gui-Shuang Ying; Carmela Ziviello; Carmela Acerra; J Fraser Wright; Jennifer Wellman McDonnell; Katherine A High; Jean Bennett; Alberto Auricchio
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 11.454

10.  Outcome measures for clinical genetics services: a comparison of genetics healthcare professionals and patients' views.

Authors:  Katherine Payne; Stuart G Nicholls; Marion McAllister; Rhona MacLeod; Ian Ellis; Dian Donnai; Linda M Davies
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 2.980

View more
  3 in total

1.  Human genome editing and the identity politics of genetic disability.

Authors:  Felicity Boardman
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-09-06

2.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for retinoblastoma survivors: a cost-effectiveness study.

Authors:  D Schofield; M J B Zeppel; S Staffieri; R N Shrestha; D Jelovic; E Lee; R V Jamieson
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2020-05-11

3.  Preventing lives affected by hemophilia: A mixed methods study of the views of adults with hemophilia and their families toward genetic screening.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman; Rachel Hale; Raksha Gohel; Philip J Young
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.183

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.