Literature DB >> 26434720

The Effects of Background and Interference Selection on Patterns of Genetic Variation in Subdivided Populations.

Kai Zeng1, Pádraic Corcoran2.   

Abstract

It is well known that most new mutations that affect fitness exert deleterious effects and that natural populations are often composed of subpopulations (demes) connected by gene flow. To gain a better understanding of the joint effects of purifying selection and population structure, we focus on a scenario where an ancestral population splits into multiple demes and study neutral diversity patterns in regions linked to selected sites. In the background selection regime of strong selection, we first derive analytic equations for pairwise coalescent times and FST as a function of time after the ancestral population splits into two demes and then construct a flexible coalescent simulator that can generate samples under complex models such as those involving multiple demes or nonconservative migration. We have carried out extensive forward simulations to show that the new methods can accurately predict diversity patterns both in the nonequilibrium phase following the split of the ancestral population and in the equilibrium between mutation, migration, drift, and selection. In the interference selection regime of many tightly linked selected sites, forward simulations provide evidence that neutral diversity patterns obtained from both the nonequilibrium and equilibrium phases may be virtually indistinguishable for models that have identical variance in fitness, but are nonetheless different with respect to the number of selected sites and the strength of purifying selection. This equivalence in neutral diversity patterns suggests that data collected from subdivided populations may have limited power for differentiating among the selective pressures to which closely linked selected sites are subject.
Copyright © 2015 by the Genetics Society of America.

Keywords:  FST; background selection; coalescent; interference selection; population subdivision

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26434720      PMCID: PMC4676517          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.178558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  59 in total

1.  The coalescent with gene conversion.

Authors:  C Wiuf; J Hein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The distribution of the coalescence time and the number of pairwise nucleotide differences in the "isolation with migration" model.

Authors:  Hilde M Wilkinson-Herbots
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Our load of mutations.

Authors:  H J MULLER
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1950-06       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  Recombination rate variation in closely related species.

Authors:  C S Smukowski; M A F Noor
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 5.  Reanalysis suggests that genomic islands of speciation are due to reduced diversity, not reduced gene flow.

Authors:  Tami E Cruickshank; Matthew W Hahn
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  The accumulation of deleterious genes in a population--Muller's Ratchet.

Authors:  J Haigh
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 8.  Genetics in geographically structured populations: defining, estimating and interpreting F(ST).

Authors:  Kent E Holsinger; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  A coalescent model of background selection with recombination, demography and variation in selection coefficients.

Authors:  K Zeng
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Widespread genomic signatures of natural selection in hominid evolution.

Authors:  Graham McVicker; David Gordon; Colleen Davis; Phil Green
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  9 in total

1.  The Relative Contributions of the X Chromosome and Autosomes to Local Adaptation.

Authors:  Clémentine Lasne; Carla M Sgrò; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The Effect of Strong Purifying Selection on Genetic Diversity.

Authors:  Ivana Cvijović; Benjamin H Good; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Estimating the parameters of background selection and selective sweeps in Drosophila in the presence of gene conversion.

Authors:  José Luis Campos; Lei Zhao; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A numerical framework for genetic hitchhiking in populations of variable size.

Authors:  Eric Friedlander; Matthias Steinrücken
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Studying models of balancing selection using phase-type theory.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth; Asger Hobolth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Ancient hybridization and strong adaptation to viruses across African vervet monkey populations.

Authors:  Hannes Svardal; Anna J Jasinska; Cristian Apetrei; Giovanni Coppola; Yu Huang; Christopher A Schmitt; Beatrice Jacquelin; Vasily Ramensky; Michaela Müller-Trutwin; Martin Antonio; George Weinstock; J Paul Grobler; Ken Dewar; Richard K Wilson; Trudy R Turner; Wesley C Warren; Nelson B Freimer; Magnus Nordborg
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Methods for Estimating Demography and Detecting Between-Locus Differences in the Effective Population Size and Mutation Rate.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Benjamin C Jackson; Henry J Barton
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Global adaptation complicates the interpretation of genome scans for local adaptation.

Authors:  Tom R Booker; Sam Yeaman; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2020-12-15

9.  Background selection as null hypothesis in population genomics: insights and challenges from Drosophila studies.

Authors:  Josep M Comeron
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.