Literature DB >> 16951063

Statistical tests for detecting positive selection by utilizing high-frequency variants.

Kai Zeng1, Yun-Xin Fu, Suhua Shi, Chung-I Wu.   

Abstract

By comparing the low-, intermediate-, and high-frequency parts of the frequency spectrum, we gain information on the evolutionary forces that influence the pattern of polymorphism in population samples. We emphasize the high-frequency variants on which positive selection and negative (background) selection exhibit different effects. We propose a new estimator of theta (the product of effective population size and neutral mutation rate), thetaL, which is sensitive to the changes in high-frequency variants. The new thetaL allows us to revise Fay and Wu's H-test by normalization. To complement the existing statistics (the H-test and Tajima's D-test), we propose a new test, E, which relies on the difference between thetaL and Watterson's thetaW. We show that this test is most powerful in detecting the recovery phase after the loss of genetic diversity, which includes the postselective sweep phase. The sensitivities of these tests to (or robustness against) background selection and demographic changes are also considered. Overall, D and H in combination can be most effective in detecting positive selection while being insensitive to other perturbations. We thus propose a joint test, referred to as the DH test. Simulations indicate that DH is indeed sensitive primarily to directional selection and no other driving forces.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16951063      PMCID: PMC1667063          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.061432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  27 in total

1.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  The "hitchhiking effect" revisited.

Authors:  N L Kaplan; R R Hudson; C H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Statistical properties of segregating sites.

Authors:  Y X Fu
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.

Authors:  Y X Fu; W H Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Properties of statistical tests of neutrality for DNA polymorphism data.

Authors:  K L Simonsen; G A Churchill; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; M T Morgan; D Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila.

Authors:  J H McDonald; M Kreitman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Evidence for positive selection in the superoxide dismutase (Sod) region of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R R Hudson; K Bailey; D Skarecky; J Kwiatowski; F J Ayala
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  135 in total

1.  Specific inactivation of two immunomodulatory SIGLEC genes during human evolution.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Wang; Nivedita Mitra; Ismael Secundino; Kalyan Banda; Pedro Cruz; Vered Padler-Karavani; Andrea Verhagen; Chris Reid; Martina Lari; Ermanno Rizzi; Carlotta Balsamo; Giorgio Corti; Gianluca De Bellis; Laura Longo; William Beggs; David Caramelli; Sarah A Tishkoff; Toshiyuki Hayakawa; Eric D Green; James C Mullikin; Victor Nizet; Jack Bui; Ajit Varki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Neutrality tests for sequences with missing data.

Authors:  Luca Ferretti; Emanuele Raineri; Sebastian Ramos-Onsins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The total branch length of sample genealogies in populations of variable size.

Authors:  A Eriksson; B Mehlig; M Rafajlovic; S Sagitov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Distinguishing positive selection from neutral evolution: boosting the performance of summary statistics.

Authors:  Kao Lin; Haipeng Li; Christian Schlötterer; Andreas Futschik
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Optimal neutrality tests based on the frequency spectrum.

Authors:  Luca Ferretti; Miguel Perez-Enciso; Sebastian Ramos-Onsins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The effects of demography and linkage on the estimation of selection and mutation parameters.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Evolutionary study of a potential selection target region in the pig.

Authors:  A Ojeda; S E Ramos-Onsins; D Marletta; L S Huang; J M Folch; M Pérez-Enciso
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Natural variation at Strubbelig Receptor Kinase 3 drives immune-triggered incompatibilities between Arabidopsis thaliana accessions.

Authors:  Rubén Alcázar; Ana V García; Ilkka Kronholm; Juliette de Meaux; Maarten Koornneef; Jane E Parker; Matthieu Reymond
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Positive selection near an inversion breakpoint on the neo-X chromosome of Drosophila americana.

Authors:  Amy L Evans; Paulina A Mena; Bryant F McAllister
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Hitchhiking both ways: effect of two interfering selective sweeps on linked neutral variation.

Authors:  Luis-Miguel Chevin; Sylvain Billiard; Frédéric Hospital
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.