Literature DB >> 33676563

Sex differences in noise-induced hearing loss: a cross-sectional study in China.

Qixuan Wang1,2,3, Xueling Wang1,2,3,4, Lu Yang1,2,3, Kun Han1,2,3, Zhiwu Huang5,6,7, Hao Wu8,9,10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Significant sex differences exist in hearing physiology, while few human studies have investigated sex differences in noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL), and the sex bias in previous studies resulted in inadequate female data. The study aims to investigate sex differences in the characteristics of NIHL to provide insight into sex-specific risk factors, prevention strategies and treatment for NIHL.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 2280 industrial noise-exposed shipyard workers (1140 males and 1140 females matched for age, job and employment length) in China. Individual noise exposure levels were measured to calculate the cumulative noise exposure (CNE), and an audiometric test was performed by an experienced technician in a soundproof booth. Sex differences in and influencing factors of low-frequency (LFHL) and high-frequency hearing loss (HFHL) were analyzed using logistic regression models stratified by age and CNE.
RESULTS: At comparable noise exposure levels and ages, the prevalence of HFHL was significantly higher in males (34.4%) than in females (13.8%), and males had a higher prevalence of HFHL (OR = 4.19, 95% CI 3.18 to 5.52) after adjusting for age, CNE, and other covariates. Sex differences were constant and highly remarkable among subjects aged 30 to 40 years and those with a CNE of 80 to 95 dB(A). Alcohol consumption might be a risk factor for HFHL in females (OR = 3.12, 95% CI 1.10 to 8.89).
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates significant sex differences in NIHL. Males are at higher risk of HFHL than females despite equivalent noise exposure and age. The risk factors for NIHL might be different in males and females.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hearing loss; Occupational noise exposure; Sex differences

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33676563      PMCID: PMC7937304          DOI: 10.1186/s13293-021-00369-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Sex Differ        ISSN: 2042-6410            Impact factor:   5.027


  39 in total

1.  Application of the kurtosis statistic to the evaluation of the risk of hearing loss in workers exposed to high-level complex noise.

Authors:  Yi-Ming Zhao; Wei Qiu; Lin Zeng; Shan-Song Chen; Xiao-Ru Cheng; Robert I Davis; Roger P Hamernik
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Differences by sex, ear, and sexual orientation in the time intervals between successive peaks in auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Michelle D Hsieh; Adrian Garcia-Sierra; Craig A Champlin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Raúl Mirza; D Bruce Kirchner; Robert A Dobie; James Crawford
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.162

4.  Declining Prevalence of Hearing Loss in US Adults Aged 20 to 69 Years.

Authors:  Howard J Hoffman; Robert A Dobie; Katalin G Losonczy; Christa L Themann; Gregory A Flamme
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.223

5.  Gender differences in occupational exposure patterns.

Authors:  Amanda Eng; Andrea 't Mannetje; Dave McLean; Lis Ellison-Loschmann; Soo Cheng; Neil Pearce
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Longitudinal study of pure-tone thresholds in older persons.

Authors:  Fu-Shing Lee; Lois J Matthews; Judy R Dubno; John H Mills
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Gender differences in a longitudinal study of age-associated hearing loss.

Authors:  J D Pearson; C H Morrell; S Gordon-Salant; L J Brant; E J Metter; L L Klein; J L Fozard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  High-frequency hearing loss, occupational noise exposure and hypertension: a cross-sectional study in male workers.

Authors:  Ta-Yuan Chang; Chiu-Shong Liu; Kuei-Hung Huang; Ren-Yin Chen; Jim-Shoung Lai; Bo-Ying Bao
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  A cross-sectional study of hearing thresholds among 4627 Norwegian train and track maintenance workers.

Authors:  Arve Lie; Marit Skogstad; Torstein Seip Johnsen; Bo Engdahl; Kristian Tambs
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  The combined effects of occupational exposure to noise and other risk factors - a systematic review.

Authors:  Rostam Golmohammadi; Ebrahim Darvishi
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.867

View more
  4 in total

1.  Acute Recreational Noise-Induced Cochlear Synaptic Dysfunction in Humans With Normal Hearing: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Qixuan Wang; Lu Yang; Minfei Qian; Yingying Hong; Xueling Wang; Zhiwu Huang; Hao Wu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  A risk model and nomogram for high-frequency hearing loss in noise-exposed workers.

Authors:  Ruican Sun; Weiwei Shang; Yingqiong Cao; Yajia Lan
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Development and initial validation of the Chinese Version of the Noise Exposure Questionnaire (C-NEQ).

Authors:  Kun Han; Qixuan Wang; Lu Yang; Sijia Xu; Chen Li; James Lin; Hao Wu; Zhiwu Huang
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Dose-Dependent Pattern of Cochlear Synaptic Degeneration in C57BL/6J Mice Induced by Repeated Noise Exposure.

Authors:  Minfei Qian; Qixuan Wang; Zhongying Wang; Qingping Ma; Xueling Wang; Kun Han; Hao Wu; Zhiwu Huang
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.599

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.