Literature DB >> 1639724

Estrogen influences auditory brainstem responses during the normal menstrual cycle.

K E Elkind-Hirsch1, W R Stoner, B A Stach, J F Jerger.   

Abstract

We evaluated the impact of the menstrual cycle on auditory brainstem response (ABR) latency in nine normally cycling women. Subjects (age 23-40 years) using no hormonal therapy were recruited and underwent ABR testing during four different phases of the same menstrual cycle: early follicular (cycle days 1 to 3); mid-cycle (cycle days 12 to 15); mid-luteal (cycle days 17 to 22), and premenstrual (cycle days 25-27). Cycles were verified by basal body temperature, and serum estrogen (E2), progesterone (P), and gonadotropin levels. A control group of nine women (age 23-40 years) on oral contraceptives (Nordette-28) was also studied four times during a pill cycle. Results show a significant increase in the latency of wave III and wave V peak latencies and in the I-V interpeak interval associated with a high estrogen state at the mid-cycle phase. No statistically significant variations in latency were found in the birth control pill group. These data suggest the existence of brainstem auditory neural pathways that are sensitive to fluctuations in E2 levels during the menstrual cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1639724     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(92)90016-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  15 in total

1.  Differences by sex, ear, and sexual orientation in the time intervals between successive peaks in auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Michelle D Hsieh; Adrian Garcia-Sierra; Craig A Champlin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  Sexual orientation and the auditory system.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 8.606

3.  Seasonal variations in auditory processing in the inferior colliculus of Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  Kimberly E Miller; Kaitlyn Barr; Mitchell Krawczyk; Ellen Covey
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Differences in common psychoacoustical tasks by sex, menstrual cycle, and race.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle H Pho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Relationships between otoacoustic emissions and a proxy measure of cochlear length derived from the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Adrian Garcia-Sierra; Michelle D Hsieh; Mindy M Maloney; Craig A Champlin; Edward G Pasanen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 6.  Sexual hearing: the influence of sex hormones on acoustic communication in frogs.

Authors:  Victoria S Arch; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Reproductive hormones modify reception of species-typical communication signals in a female anuran.

Authors:  Kathleen S Lynch; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 1.808

Review 8.  Estrogenic modulation of auditory processing: a vertebrate comparison.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 8.606

9.  Songbird frequency selectivity and temporal resolution vary with sex and season.

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Therese S Salameh; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Auditory evoked potentials: Differences by sex, race, and menstrual cycle and correlations with common psychoacoustical tasks.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Craig A Champlin; Michelle H Pho; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.