Literature DB >> 20875439

Coordination deficits in ideomotor apraxia during visually targeted reaching reflect impaired visuomotor transformations.

Pratik K Mutha1, Robert L Sainburg, Kathleen Y Haaland.   

Abstract

Ideomotor limb apraxia, commonly defined as a disorder of skilled, purposeful movement, is characterized by spatiotemporal deficits during a variety of actions. These deficits have been attributed to damage to, or impaired retrieval of, stored representations of learned actions, especially object-related movements. However, such deficits might also arise from impaired visuomotor transformation mechanisms that operate in parallel to or downstream from mechanisms for storage of action representations. These transformation processes convert extrinsic visual information into intrinsic neural commands appropriate for the desired motion. These processes are a key part of the movement planning process and performance errors due to inadequate transformations have been shown to increase with the dynamic complexity of the movement. This hypothesis predicts that apraxic patients should show planning deficits when reaching to visual targets, especially when the coordination and/or dynamic requirements of the task increase. Three groups (18 healthy controls, 9 non-apraxic and 9 apraxic left hemisphere damaged patients) performed reaching movements to visual targets that varied in the degree of interjoint coordination required. Relative to the other two groups, apraxic patients made larger initial direction errors and showed higher variability during their movements, especially when reaching to the target with the highest intersegmental coordination requirement. These problems were associated with poor coordination of shoulder and elbow torques early in the movement, consistent with poor movement planning. These findings suggest that the requirement to transform extrinsic visual information into intrinsic motor commands impedes the ability to accurately plan a visually targeted movement in ideomotor limb apraxia. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20875439      PMCID: PMC3712783          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  75 in total

1.  Separate adaptive mechanisms for controlling trajectory and final position in reaching.

Authors:  Robert A Scheidt; Claude Ghez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Sensory-motor and cognitive functions of the human posterior parietal cortex involved in manual actions.

Authors:  Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  Different learned coordinate frames for planning trajectories and final positions in reaching.

Authors:  Claude Ghez; Robert Scheidt; Hank Heijink
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neural underpinnings of gesture discrimination in patients with limb apraxia.

Authors:  Mariella Pazzaglia; Nicola Smania; Elisabetta Corato; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Apraxia and the parietal lobes.

Authors:  Georg Goldenberg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Visual modulation of proprioceptive reflexes during movement.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Philippe Boulinguez; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Hemispheric specialization and functional impact of ipsilesional deficits in movement coordination and accuracy.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 8.  The roles of vision and proprioception in the planning of reaching movements.

Authors:  Fabrice R Sarlegna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  The influence of target sensory modality on motor planning may reflect errors in sensori-motor transformations.

Authors:  F R Sarlegna; A Przybyla; R L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Dissociation of initial trajectory and final position errors during visuomotor adaptation following unilateral stroke.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  23 in total

1.  Critical neural substrates for correcting unexpected trajectory errors and learning from them.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Relationship of diminished interjoint coordination after stroke to hand path consistency.

Authors:  Geetanjali Gera; Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas; John Peter Scholz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Hemispheric specialization for movement control produces dissociable differences in online corrections after stroke.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Pratik K Mutha; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Left parietal regions are critical for adaptive visuomotor control.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Reply: apraxia: a gestural or a cognitive disorder?

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Allison D Shapiro; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Functional Deficits in the Less-Impaired Arm of Stroke Survivors Depend on Hemisphere of Damage and Extent of Paretic Arm Impairment.

Authors:  Candice Maenza; David C Good; Carolee J Winstein; David A Wagstaff; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  Female CGG knock-in mice modeling the fragile X premutation are impaired on a skilled forelimb reaching task.

Authors:  Amanda A Diep; Michael R Hunsaker; Richard Kwock; Kyoungmi Kim; Rob Willemsen; Robert F Berman
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Dynamic dominance varies with handedness: reduced interlimb asymmetries in left-handers.

Authors:  Andrzej Przybyla; David C Good; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Contralesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke reflect hemisphere-specific control mechanisms.

Authors:  Saandeep Mani; Pratik K Mutha; Andrzej Przybyla; Kathleen Y Haaland; David C Good; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Conceptual- and production-related predictors of pantomimed tool use deficits in apraxia.

Authors:  S A Jax; D L Rosa-Leyra; L J Buxbaum
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.